June 2016

Error message

Pastors and rules of professional conduct...

Should pastors and theologians be held to at least the same ethical standards as lawyers? 

Scrupulous fidelity to truth and the meaning of words is not normally the first quality one associates with a lawyer. An undergraduate faculty advisor referred to my decision to go to law school as getting a "license to steal." The fictional law firm Dewey, Cheatham & Howe entered an appearance or two in a civil procedure professor's hypotheticals in the first year of law school. You'll also find the entry "Lawyers, Derogatory Names for" in a legal usage dictionary. Along with old standbys like "ambulance chaser," "hired gun," "pettifogger," and "shyster," other epithets like "latrine lawyer," "mouthpiece," and "Philadelphia lawyer" abound. This last one—"Philadelphia lawyer"—can bear either a positive or negative sense. It can mean either "an ultracompetent lawyer who knows the ins and outs of legal technicalities" or "a shrewdly unscrupulous lawyer."1

Because of this sadly deserved unsavory reputation, because of the awesome responsibility they have for the lives and property of their clients, and because of the complexity of the law even before it exploded like a supernova in the 20th century, lawyers must submit themselves to well-settled rules of professional conduct. One of these rules demands candor to the court.2 This rule requires...

The good father: a church with Biblical preaching...

As fathers, our job is not done when we provide bread for our wife and newborn son or daughter. The man of the house used to be called the "breadwinner." Men used to take pride in it, but remember that the spiritual bread we provide our family is more important than physical bread. When God brought the sons of Israel into the Promised Land, He warned them:

...man does not live by bread alone, but man lives by everything that proceeds out of the mouth of the LORD. (Deuteronomy 8:3b)

Dr. Goligher's misuse of Calvin...

It is now crystal clear that Dr. Goligher has misquoted Calvin on the question of women in civil government, incorrectly claiming that Calvin would be on his side in the current debates about the meaning and purpose of sexuality.

When conservative Reformed men are engaged in theological argument, being able to claim Calvin on one's side is a big deal. We are protestants, and so no appeal to church history can prevail in the face of the clear testimony of scripture. But because we are conservative and because we are Reformed we care about what the church has taught, particularly the reformers, and particularly Calvin.

Carl Trueman, Aimee Byrd, and Todd Pruitt, the collective authors and podcasters at Mortification of Spin, are engaged in a persistent campaign to limit the meaning and purpose of sexuality. I think "persistent campaign" is a very fair description of the wide range of posts and podcasts on the subject over the last year. Specifically, they claim that men like John Piper and Wayne Grudem have "betrayed" women, allowed them to be "micro-managed," and ignored abuse in the home and church. They also claim that the complementarity of man and women is limited only to the home and church. Dr. Trueman wrote that complementarianism "lost its way when it became an all-embracing view of the world and not simply a matter for church and household." Dr. Goligher has now joined them in this campaign and tried to enlist Calvin on their side. 

So you can see how quoting Calvin on these matters is quite significant.

Here is the quote which Dr. Goligher attributes to Calvin. I provide some context so the reader can see exactly how Calvin is being used. He writes:

Psalm 12: flatterers and blithe liars...

Last week I preached on Psalm 12. In this Psalm, this prayer of David, he cries out to God for help because the wicked have taken over. What is their character?

They speak falsehood to one another; With flattering lips and with a double heart they speak. (Psalms 12:2)

A couple points from the commenters:

First, they point out how common it has been through history for evil and the wicked to prevail, and this within the Church. They make the observation that David is lamenting the ascendancy of evil among God's covenant people, the Church. When David starts the Psalm, he is not crying out for God to help him against the Egyptians or Canaanites, but the sons of Israel who were God's covenant people.

Second, the commenters point out how terrible it is when deception is the method of communication between citizens, neighbors, families, and spouses. David records that lies are what they tell "to one another." One commenter emphasizes that the lies extend to themselves...

The discontent demographic...

This post by Wendy Foulke, Director of Women's Ministries at Christ the Word, demonstrates the kind of leadership we need in the PCA. Christianity Today's article on the PCA study committee on women in the church referred to the PCA having been formed from churches "opposed to women in church leadership." Not true; in fact, disingenuously tendentious. We'll place our female leaders against any church's at any level and in any capacity: intellectually, organizationally, knowledge of God's Word, ability to teach, wisdom.

The only "leadership" realm we'd likely fall short in is discontentment...

Carl Trueman's embarrassing silence...

[UPDATE: Tuesday morning, June 28, Liam Goligher texted me with his Calvin source. To quote, "Calvin to Cecil, 28th January 1559, ZL, vol. II, p34-36." Liam says this proves his point. Of course, it doesn't. Calvin held the very opposite of what Liam continues to claim and it seems apparent Liam hasn't read the sources I provided in my earlier post (including another letter he wrote to Cecil). 

Liam and Carl's halfway covenant of male authority limited to home and church ordination is not the doctrine of Scripture. Thus it was never taught by the Reformers—least of all John Calvin. Rather, Calvin said the government of women "ought to be counted among the judgments with which God visits us," that it "ought to be held as a judgment on man for his dereliction," and that it "is utterly at variance with the legitimate order of nature."]

Carl Trueman teaches church history at Philly's Westminster Seminary. In his WTS profile, among his credentials, Trueman includes:

 [I am] currently co-editing with Bruce Gordon the Oxford Handbook of Calvin and Calvinism...

Trueman claims he knows Calvin, so it's quite embarrassing that Trueman's blog published a howler of a misquotation of Calvin twenty-four days ago, now...

SCOTUS: Do I not hate those who hate You, O Lord...

So the Supreme Court has ruled against restrictions on abortion passed into law by the legislature of the state of Texas.

So what? We're supposed to be interested in what these bloody ghouls vote and write? One could be thirty years deep into a persistent vegetative state and still correctly predict the court would overrule any effort to slow down their slaughter. It's the central narrative of our nation's political life.

Joe Sobran used to point out that...

Johnny Manziel: Daddy tried...

Paul Manziel, father of released Cleveland Browns quarterback Johnny Manziel, responding to questions about his son asked by ESPN's Josina Anderson:

He's a druggie. It's not a secret that he's a druggie. I don't know what to say other than my son is a druggie and he needs help. He just hasn't [sought] it yet. Hopefully he doesn't die before he comes to his senses. That's about all you can say. I don't know what else to say.

Questioned about what he has done to help his son, Manziel's father responded...

The good father: you are what you eat...

The last thing you think about when your first child is born is your church. Rather, your mind is focussed on the hospital (or midwife) bill, whether you have enough diapers, how long your mother-in-law will stay, which car seat to buy, whether you and your mother-in-law will get along, whether your mother-in-law and your wife will get along, when your baby's conehead will go away... But the church?

Isn't the church like a sound system; if you have to think about it, it's failed? Your wife has just given birth to your first child and the church should stay in the background. Yeah, the first day or so it would be nice if the pastor and his wife visit, hold the baby, read Psalm 139 (except those crazy verses near the end), pray, and leave. Also, it would be nice if the church women helped with food. They can fill your refrigerator with...

The Christian view of euthanasia...

One of the most distressing aspects of serving as Christ's witnesses against the judicial execution of Terri Schiavo eleven years ago was how often we heard Terri's supporters passionately making the case that Terri is not in a persistent vegetative state. Often, Terri's executioners differed from her protectors only in having come to opposite conclusions as to whether or not Terri was in a persistent vegetative state. One side thought she was and so their question was, "Why not let her die?" The other side thought she wasn't and so their response was "Because Terri is not in a persistent vegetative state."

Both statements have more in common with each other than with Scripture's teaching on this matter since the same sentiment is being expressed: namely, that it would be proper to starve Terri to death if it were clear she were in a persistent vegetative state. If denying Terri food and water is simply "letting her die," then a persistent vegetative state is really the process of dying and the denial of Terri's supporters that she is in a PVS is an indication that they think this a crucial distinction. So, as I said, we were saddened by this lack of biblical discernment evidenced by many in and surrounding the Schiavo case, and since.

Too many of our pastors have refused to study this matter and have come to their conclusions more through sentiment and their own ethical sloth than the study of our fathers in the faith through the centuries and their teaching in the Westminster Standards (or other doctrinal standards) applying God's revelation in His Word, the Bible, to such suffering.

To help in that work, I am here posting a statement on euthanasia...

Right. Got it.

Doug Wilson—31 January 2012:

Doug Wilson: "Feminism is a trinitarian heresy. Subordination is not inequality in essence." #dgpascon

— Desiring God (@desiringGod) January 31, 2012

Doug Wilson—14 June 2016: 

Doug Wilson: Subordination "does in fact play old harry with the divine simplicity, and the unity of the divine will, and eventually monotheism."

Subordination and the Trinity....

(Note: this is David, not Tim) Two men I regard as friends recently came out against the subordination of Christ to the Father.

Pages