Recent Comments

The link for the longer video seems to be wonky.  I get a "page does not exist" notice.

The actual difference here is between that of the Abolitionist and the Prolifer.

“Abolitionist” is not a synonym for “pro-lifer.”

Pro-life is the expression of a moral opinion. Abolition is the expression of a moral action. When you call yourself “pro-life” you are letting people know what you think about abortion. When you call yourself an abolitionist, you are telling them what you aim to do about it.

Pro-lifers prefer gradual, over immediate, abolition.

Abolitionism has historically been wed to the doctrine of immediatism.  The history of the pro-life movement has been one of gradualistic means and measures, incremental legislation, ameliorative programs, and the inclusion of exceptions to abortion along the way to its eventual total abolition. Abolitionists reject the idea that you can effectively fight evil by allowing it in some cases or doing away with it by planned incremental steps. Abolitionists reject the notion that you can ever commit a little evil in order that good may come. Abolitionists cry NO COMPROMISE!!! Pro-lifers cry “get the best that you can get when you can get it,” and consistently support the “lesser of two evils.”

You can be a secular pro-lifer. You cannot be a secular abolitionist.

To be an abolitionist you must believe in a higher law. One does not need to believe in a higher law or deity to embrace an adverse opinion regarding abortion. But to argue that abortion is evil and ought to be abolished regardless of whether 99.99999% of the rest of the human population agrees with you requires the existence of a binding moral law which has its reference point outside of humanity.

Pro-lifers prefer common ground. Abolitionists prefer to proclaim the gospel.

A majority of pro-life leaders and organizations argue that one need not convince a person that God exists or that abortion is sin, in order to convert them to the pro-life position. While this may be true, abolitionists never choose to remove God or the gospel from the conversation. Abolitionists believe that abortion exists because men  deny that God does. The pro-life movement argues that we should talk less about sin and more about science. Less about salvation and more about “saving the babies.”

Central to the work abolition is the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. Bringing abortion and its justifications into conflict with the Gospel is the primary mechanism of Abolition. Abolitionist understand our work as being part of the Great Commission. Abolitionists adopt these Five Tenets of Abolition and practice these  Two Modes of Abolitionism

THE PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT ARGUES THAT WE SHOULD FOCUS ON SAVING THE BABIES. THE ABOLITIONIST MOVEMENT ARGUES THAT WE SHOULD FOCUS ON CONVERTING THE CULTURE. ABOLITIONISTS BELIEVE THAT SAVING SOULS HOLDS THE KEY TO SAVING BABIES. ABOLITIONISTS BELIEVE THAT A CONVERT TO CHRIST IS A CONVERT TO THE CAUSE OF ABOLITION. 

I would respectfully point out that by no means all Christians are anti-abortion and remind you that not all Christians are American. It's a world religion and different nations have their own emphasis.

I'm British, and many British Christians, including those I would consider very devout, would not agree with your assumptions. While none of us are in favour of abortion, most of us see it as sometimes the best choice in an impossible situation.

I would add that it doesn't sit well that a nation which seems often to produce such vehement views on abortion, even attacks on clinics or picketing vulnerable women, should have a higher abortion rate, and a higher unwed teen pregnancy rate compared to Europe where (apart from Ireland) abortion is not particularly controversial among Christians, apart from Catholics (and by no means all of them.)

To put the argument in a broader field, in connection with a completely different matter, I recently became aware that in my country roughly one child a week is killed by a parent or guardian. Saddened, I compared the figures here to those from the USA. There is a huge difference between our two nations. Allowing for different population size, the child homicide rate in the US is roughly ten times the British one! Why do you think this is?

I wonder how many of those murdered children were never wanted? I can't help but think the church in the US would be better served working to help poor and friendless parents, to improve healthcare and social support. Seems to me that the pragmatic approach to abortion and birth control taken by Christians in the UK and other developed countries produces more Godly results, kinder, gentler, with far fewer (around a 10th) children abused or killed. Is it right to press unwilling women to bring children into homes where they are unwanted and into poverty?

You can argue that these abortion are in themselves murders, though I would disagree. One argument I would put is that we all know abortion is a procured miscarriage. So let's look at miscarriage in terms of the church. To do so is very informative. Miscarriages are not, and have never been, treated by Christians as the deaths of children. No. A miscarriage has always been left unacknowledged by the church, a private family grief. It's the ready and safe availability of abortion that's changed people's position. A miscarriage is still no one else's business yet, if a pregnancy is ended deliberately, suddenly these fetuses become people who are being murdered. I -- and others -- cannot agree. Unless the churches treat a miscarried fetus as equivalent to the death of a child, I cannot see that your arguments against abortion are coherent or consistent. In closing, I would suggest that you unthinkingly make a lot of ungrounded assumptions about the unanimity of Christian opinion. Perhaps you might consider that the Internet is a global thing with not all Christians sharing your agenda or priorities in terms of sexual health. This is important. To my sorrow, for example, there are African churches who approve imprisonment, even the death penalty for homosexuality. The church is a big, very varied place.

• http://www.nspcc.org.uk/inform/research/statistics/child_homicide_statis...
• http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/homicidechildrenyouth.pdf

I hear you, Father Bill. Europe is a cesspool. I've only experienced it a bit,  but I'm with you. MTW had an area retreat in Greece many years ago and they gave out warnings for those who went into Athens for an afternoon of shopping. It wasn't as bad as your description of Vienna, but it was still pretty bad. Glad I don't live there. Pray for those missionaries who labor in Europe and face this everyday.