(by Tim) From comments recently posted, it's evident some readers have entered this blog's conversation recently being unaware of David's and my writing on sexuality over the years. May I recommend the entry "Feminism" (under the category index on the left side of the page) as a book newcomers would benefit from reading? (Also, the entry "Carolyn Custis James.") And happy day, this book won't cost you one lousy dime.
For instance, one reader recently commented that David and I must believe "men should be doing everything in the Church and women nothing."
It's hard to express the revulsion washing over me like a wave when the practice of orthodox Christians across two thousand years is described in this way. To say it's a straw man doesn't begin to address what's wrong with this attack. The conceit of the modern; the utter ignorance of church history; the uncharitable assumptions about all the godly men and women who have gone before us... Someone famous once quipped something like, "My dear man, no one can fault you for thinking that thought--many others think the same, today. But for Heaven's sake, don't actually say it!"
The battle for Biblical sexuality is not for the faint of heart. So then, from February 13, 2006, here's one of many posts making clear that Biblical womanhood is not barefoot and pregnant womanhood.
* * *
What's the flap over Carolyn Custis James all about...
One
of our good readers finds it impossible to understand what all the fuss
is about with Carolyn Custis James's article and words? Why are women
and men opposing the quite-reasonable complaints Mrs. James makes
concering the evangelical church's abuse of highly educated female
theologians? Why are we opposed to women being theologians? Isn't that
a good thing that every man should support?
Well of course. Where did anyone here ever say or even intimate that
women shouldn't be theologians. But let's not allow this red herring to
throw us off the real issue...