May 2006

Oh, the horror of it!

Dad used to say every article in Reader's Digest fit into one of three categories: "Oh, the wonder of it," "Oh, the horror of it," and just plain "Oh."

Last week I was skin diving off the beach of Florida's Caladesi Island State Park. Mary Lee and I had a wedding in Orlando on Memorial Day and we'd taken a couple days of vacation in the Clearwater Beach area. Mary Lee had heard that Caladesi Island was beautiful so we drove up to Honeymoon Island and took the ferry over. She was on the beach with her book and I was out in the water looking for sand dollars and shells. All of a sudden my mask got dark, but the darkness seemed to be inside the mask!

Being color blind, it took a moment to realize what the darkness was, but soon it was clear I'd gotten a nosebleed and my mask was filled with blood. I ripped the mask off and rinsed it out, but as soon as I put it on, it again began to fill with blood. Then it occurred to me that, for once in my life, the nosebleed thing was no big deal. After all, I was in water and the water quickly washed it all away.

For a while, I kept pulling the mask off to rinse it, but then I realized the nose bleed was less of a big deal than I'd thought: I didn't even need to take my mask off and rinse it since the purge valve would work as well with blood as it did with water. So then I just cleared the mask in the normal way, blowing air into the mask to displace the water and blood. (Now you know more than you ever wanted to know about nosebleeds while skin diving, right?)

Mary Lee got up from her perch on the sand and came out into the water to talk. She suggested I go over and offer to help two men who were looking for a pair of sunglasses one of them had dropped into the water. I swam over and offered my help. They told me the general area where they thought the sunglasses had fallen and I began to sweep the area under water. A couple times I came up to get oriented, once quite near one of the men. Seeing the blood, he asked me whether I was worried about sharks? I said, "No, not really," but when I went back under, I was worried about sharks.

There wasn't much I could do, though, other than to get out of the water and gross out the people on the beach as I stood there waiting for the bleeding to stop. Much better to be under water with the water washing it all away. While waiting I remembered my son, Taylor, had said that if a shark attacked you, you needed to punch it in its gills or eyes--not its mouth. My fist was ready.

It took about a half hour before the bleeding stopped. I was relieved not to have to worry about sharks anymore. The two men left without finding their glasses and I continued to sweep up and down the beach, picking up dead sand dollars and shells. About an hour after the men left, I found a pair of sunglasses, but Mary Lee said they were ugly so we threw them out on our way back to the ferry.

In the car on the way home we talked about how disastrous it would be if the nosebleed returned during the wedding, but we forgot to knock on wood...

Kelvin Sampson: Happy Father's Day, early...

After reading the earlier post on Indiana University basketball, Brandon Dutcher, a fellow member of the Presbyterian Church in America, posted this comment which seemed best not to leave buried in the comments section. Thanks, Brandon, for adding your thoughts. This is a good encouragment to all of us to be better fathers. Happy Father's Day, early!

As a lifelong Sooner fan (and a PCA Presbyterian), I am disappointed in Coach Sampson for breaking the rules. Yet I have to say I genuinely like the guy and wish him the best at IU. I can promise you he does have some redeeming qualities, as you'll see if you read the column I have shamelessly inserted below. So give him a chance. Perhaps things will turn out better than you think.

-Brandon Dutcher

Father-Son Camp: It's About Time

[This column was published on Father's Day 2003 in The Sunday Oklahoman.]

This is the third Father's Day in a row that I've woken up sore.

But it's worth it, because I love spending time with my 10-year-old son at Kelvin Sampson's annual Father-Child Basketball Camp, held on the University of Oklahoma campus over Father's Day weekend.

Lincoln and I are among the 100-plus campers living in Walker Tower, eating at the Couch Cafeteria and playing ball in the Sooners' extraordinary practice facility adjacent to the Lloyd Noble Center. We practice our shooting and ball-handling, engage in sadistic stretching exercises, and battle other father-son combos in the two-on-two "Cutthroat" competition.

In a recent interview, Sampson told me he first got the idea for a father-son camp while running summer camps as a young head coach at Montana Tech. He even participated with his own son, Kellen.

Tags: 

IU President Adam Herbert: Coach Sampson has "highest integrity"...

In the past, my wife and I had some arguments about a certain IU basketball coach. More recently, though, we've been seeing things the same. We both liked Coach Mike Davis and we both were disgusted when Kelvin Sampson was hired to replace Coach Davis.

Then, this morning, Mary Lee brought me the paper opened to the article announcing the NCAA's sanctions against Coach Sampson for his recruiting violations back at Oklahoma. Dropping the paper next to me, she said, "I hope by some fluke he brings a losing streak to Indiana." I agree.

So why are we so hostile to Coach Sampson?

We're not. Our hostility is directed towards IU basketball in general; and more specifically...

A Muslim view of the Cross...

A couple years ago I was in London and went to Speaker's Corner in Hyde Park to listen. (Speaker's Corner is the place where, for generations, men have taken a milk crate or stepladder and preached to anyone listening.)

On a Sunday afternoon a year earlier, I'd spent several hours there. That day, the subjects were overwhelmingly religious. A Messianic Jew proclaimed Jesus' Messianic fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies to the most hateful audience of Jews imaginable. I admired his courage and wondered whether the bobbies (London policemen) standing guard might not arrest him for inciting a riot. Afterwards I thanked him for his boldness. A year later we renewed our acquaintance.

This time, though, there was a pronounced change. It had all gone over to politics--specifically, hatred for the United States and anger over our war in Iraq. At some point I spoke up and was immediately surrounded by a small group of Muslims spewing venom: "You're an American, aren't you?"

"Yes," I responded, "but more importantly, I'm a Christian--and that comes far before my citizenship."

"So then you worship a god who couldn't keep himself from being murdered on a cross!" they announced gleefully. As they saw it, their victory was complete. The simple fact of our Lord's death on the Cross showed me for a fool.

Such an earthly and logical view of Jesus' death caught me off guard. I'd spent my life in a Christianized country where the cross is just one more piece of jewelry. Madonna just staged the opening concert of her comeback tour and this time her central drama involves mounting and hanging on a large crucifix. Here we have the cross as stage prop.

"You think God coming down to earth and being crucified on a cross is a sign of weakness?" I asked the Muslims. "Then you worship strength and power. And if power's what it's all about, the United States is your god--not mine, but yours."

Tags: 

Go figure...

A couple months ago I ran into a woman wearing a medium sized cross on her necklace, so I asked if she was a Christian?

She said, "Yes, why do you ask?"

"Because you're wearing a cross," I said.

"Oh, that's just a decoration," she responded, "but I am a Christian."

The DaVinci Code: don't bother...

After my wife, Mary Lee, and I had a date eating strawberry shortcake at the courthouse square this afternoon, I visited our best local used bookstore, Caveat Emptor, to browse through its new arrivals. When I walked in, Caveat's proprietor, Janos Starks, asked, "So, are you having any repercussions in your congregation from the release of The DaVinci Code?"

"No," I said. "There are two types of churches: those that believe discernment is good and those that think it's bad. We think it's good so we have no trouble understanding a novel that presents sex as a sacrament and tells us Jesus was married."

A couple years ago, my cousin, John DeWalt, sent me his discarded copy of The DaVinci Code telling me I ought to read it since it was important for me to know what everyone else was reading. Dutifully, I read it and can say that this book and the movie that closely follows it are not worth anyone's time. Simply put, The DaVinci Code is blasphemy and sacrilege dressed up as a murder mystery.

Picture the goddess worship of ancient paganism, the virulent anti-Catholicism of contemporary American culture, and the mystical babble of New Agers all clomped together in a religion that has a public ritual of sexual intercourse as its highest sacrament, and you've got the picture. Why would any Christian want to watch or read this demonic story?

Yet, I can hear the answer, "Because we can't engage our neighbors on the issues unless we have read the book or seen the movie ourselves. This is a great opportunity to dialog with unbelievers. Why waste it by not gaining the credibility that would come from knowing the story ourselves?"

Tags: 

Spiritual qualifications for worship leaders: the shape of things to come...

The federal Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals just issued a ruling confirming the punishment of Protestant chaplain, William Akridge, for not allowing an open sodomite to lead the praise band in the Protestant worship services at Ohio's Madison Correctional Institution.

Akridge, a graduate of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, explained his actions: "The leaders that the chaplain selects implicitly implies an endorsement and approval of the lifestyle of the selected leaders. (Having a sodomite as our praise band leader) would violate my conscience and make me guilty in the sight of God."

The Wrong "Guy" for the BBC...

(Update: The BBC asked YouTube to remove its video of the interview. BBC's explanation and video of the incident is available here. Good video of the interview is also available here.)

Check out this video. The BBC was doing a breaking news segment on last week's British court decision in favor of Apple Computer in a lawsuit against ITunes by the Beatles' Apple Records.

Their hope was to have Guy Kewney, European editor of EWeek.com, comment live on BBC news. But when Guy Goma showed up for an employment interview with the BBC's IT department, the receptionist sent him right into the studio where they were live on camera.

The look on his face in the first few seconds is priceless.

Chesterton on the gigantic task of motherhood...

Again, on this Mother's Day, David and I dedicate to our mother, Mary Lou Bayly; and to our wives, Cheryl and Mary Lee, this and the previous excerpts from Chesterton's, What's Wrong with the World.

From "The Emancipation of Domesticity"

Supposing it to be conceded that humanity has acted at least not unnaturally in dividing itself into two halves, respectively typifying the ideals of special talent and of general sanity (since they are genuinely difficult to combine completely in one mind), it is not difficult to see why the line of cleavage has followed the line of sex, or why the female became the emblem of the universal and the male of the special and superior. Two gigantic facts of nature fixed it thus: first, that the woman who frequently fulfilled her functions literally could not be specially prominent in experiment and adventure; and second, that the same natural operation surrounded her with very young children, who require to be taught not so much anything as everything. Babies need not to be taught a trade, but to be introduced to a world. To put the matter shortly, woman is generally shut up in a house with a human being at the time when he asks all the questions that there are, and some that there aren't. It would be odd if she retained any of the narrowness of a specialist.

Now if anyone says that this duty of general enlightenment (even when freed from modern rules and hours, and exercised more spontaneously by a more protected person) is in itself too exacting and oppressive, I can understand the view. I can only answer that our race has thought it worth while to cast this burden on women in order to keep common-sense in the world. But when people begin to talk about this domestic duty as not merely difficult but trivial and dreary, I simply give up the question. For I cannot with the utmost energy of imagination conceive what they mean. When domesticity, for instance, is called drudgery, all the difficulty arises from a double meaning in the word. If drudgery only means dreadfully hard work, I admit the woman drudges in the home, as a man might drudge at the Cathedral of Amiens or drudge behind a gun at Trafalgar. But if it means that the hard work is more heavy because it is trifling, colorless and of small import to the soul, then as I say, I give it up; I do not know what the words mean.

Tags: 

Chesterton on the timeless battle between man and woman...

On this Mother's Day, David and I dedicate to our mother, Mary Lou Bayly; and to our wives, Cheryl and Mary Lee, this and the following excerpts from Chesterton's, What's Wrong with the World.

From "The Pedant and the Savage"

Some impatient trader, some superficial missionary, walks across an island and sees the squaw digging in the fields while the man is playing a flute; and immediately says that the man is a mere lord of creation and the woman a mere serf. He does not remember that he might see the same thing in half the back gardens in Brixton, merely because women are at once more conscientious and more impatient, while men are at once more quiescent and more greedy for pleasure. It may often be in Hawaii simply as it is in Hoxton. That is, the woman does not work because the man tells her to work and she obeys.

On the contrary, the woman works because she has told the man to work and he hasn't obeyed. I do not affirm that this is the whole truth, but I do affirm that we have too little comprehension of the souls of savages to know how far it is untrue. It is the same with the relations of our hasty and surface science, with the problem of sexual dignity and modesty. Professors find all over the world fragmentary ceremonies in which the bride affects some sort of reluctance, hides from her husband, or runs away from him.

The professor then pompously proclaims that this is a survival of Marriage by Capture. I wonder he never says that the veil thrown over the bride is really a net. I gravely doubt whether women ever were married by capture I think they pretended to be; as they do still.

It is equally obvious that these two necessary sanctities of thrift and dignity are bound to come into collision with the wordiness, the wastefulness, and the perpetual pleasure-seeking of masculine companionship. Wise women allow for the thing; foolish women try to crush it; but all women try to counteract it, and they do well.

In many a home all round us at this moment, we know that the nursery rhyme is reversed. The queen is in the counting-house, counting out the money. The king is in the parlor, eating bread and honey. But it must be strictly understood that the king has captured the honey in some heroic wars.

Tags: 

Spurgeon on "The Men" of Scotland...

We used to have in our Baptist churches substantial men who would as soon have brooked Satan at their own table as an unsound preacher in the pulpit. There used to be a company in the north of Scotland called "The Men." Why, if heresy had been preached before them, they would have been as provoked as Janet Geddes when she threw her cutty stool at the head of the preacher. They would not have endured these modern heresies as the present effeminate generation is enduring them. Let the new theologians have liberty to preach what they like on their own ground, but not in our pulpits.

Alas! the leading members in many churches are Christians without backbones, molluscous, spongy; snails I would call them, only they have not the consistency of a snail's shell. They are ready to swallow any mortal thing if the preacher seems clever and eloquent. Cleverness and eloquence--away with them forever! If it is not the truth of God, the more cleverly and eloquently it is preached the more damnable it is. We must have the truth and nothing but the truth, and I charge the fathers in Christ all over England and America to see to this. Get ye to your watchtower and guard the flock, lest the sheep be destroyed while they are asleep.

-Spurgeon, "Fathers in Christ," Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit Vol. 29.

(Thanks, Chris.)

Tags: 

Pro-sodomy Episcopal bishop says "Schism is a greater sin than heresy"...

Like all the mainline denominations, Episcopalians are fighting over whether or not sodomy is sin, as well as whether sodomites should be elevated to rule as bishops. Interestingly, some of the most aggressive advocates of sodomy are not yet ready to see sodomites become bishops, not because they are unrepentant in their sin, but because of a broadly shared concern that electing another sodomite to the bishopric will split their Anglican communion worldwide. The Africans have made it clear they won't stand for it and many biblical Episcopalians here in these United States are threatening to leave the denomination.

This is the context for an article that ran in the May 5, 2006 New York Times titled "Episcopalians Divide Again Over Electing Gay Bishop" in which Bishop Kirk S. Smith of the diocese of Arizona is quoted saying, "My No. 1 directive as a bishop is the unity of church, because schism is a greater sin than heresy."

The bad bishop is, of course, an advocate of sodomy, as well as of sodomites being promoted to the office of bishop. But recognizing the divisiveness of his position, he thinks it's better to delay electing a sodomite to the bishopric for a few years. "I think everyone will breathe a sigh of relief if it's not a gay candidate, and that's sad." Thus, Bishop Smith says it's a "heresy" to call sodomites to repent and to oppose their elevation to the office of bishop.

But the true believer knows there can never be peace or unity where the doctrine of Christ or the holiness without which no man will see God is despised. If a man in the church in Galatia continued in his error, demanding Gentiles be circumcised and men earn their salvation, Paul called down God's curse upon him because he was opposing the glory of our Redeemer, Jesus Christ. "Let him be anathema!" Paul says.

And clearly Paul would remind those who advocate sodomy today of the great separation of fire and brimstone God rained down on Sodom and Gomorrah because of their sexual perversion...

Pages