May 2005

Three Down, Two to Go....

Michal&Ben.jpg

Some of you have wondered where Tim has disappeared to in recent days. Well, part of the reason for his absence from the blog recently is due to an event we celebrated in Nashville, IN, last Saturday afternoon when Tim's third child, Michal, was married.

Michal Louise follows older siblings Heather and Joseph in marriage. Michal married Ben Crum, son of PCA pastor David Crum. The wedding was beautifully simple, with traditional vows and a bluegrass band at the reception.

Members of the family were disappointed that Michal's maternal grandfather, Ken Taylor, was not able to attend the wedding. Mr. Taylor's ill health kept him home--the first of his grandchildren's weddings he has been forced to miss. Tim took Mr. Taylor's place by pronouncing the father's blessing, a Taylor family tradition.

May God add His blessing to Michal and Ben's life together.

Also, pray for God's grace for Mr. and Mrs. Taylor in these difficult days. Mr. Taylor is one of the truly great men of the evangelical movement and his departure to eternity will be all our loss.

Tags: 

Joab, Abner and their Young Men....

In the early days of division between Judah and Israel following the death of Saul and Jonathan the armies of Ish Bosheth (son of Saul) and David met for battle at the pool of Gibeon.

There at Gibeon Abner, general for Ish Bosheth, and Joab, general of David's army, met across the pool from each other. "Let the young men arise and compete before us," Abner suggested to Joab. It was arranged: twelve men of Benjamin for Ish Bosheth and twelve of Judah for David arose. Each gripped his foe by the head, plunged his sword into the other's side and fell dead.

We're told by Scripture that the ensuing battle was fierce but that as the day progressed the forces of Joab and David prevailed. As the army of Judah chased the forces of Benjamin, Asahel, brother of Joab and Abishai, who was fleet of foot, pursued Abner with singular zeal. Abner urged him to turn aside to a younger man--"Why should I strike you to the ground? How then could I lift up my face to your brother, Joab?" Abner asked. But Asahel would not turn aside.

Finally, in exasperation (and perhaps desperation), Abner turned and thrust the butt of his spear at the younger man. The spear went through his stomach, out his back, and Asahael fell dead.

Joab and Abishai continued their pursuit of Abner into the evening, but as night was falling the forces of Benjamin rallied behind Abner on a hilltop. Abner cried out to Joab, "Shall the sword devour forever? Do you not know that the end will be bitter? How long will it be before you tell your people to turn from the pursuit of their brothers?"

Joab blew the trumpet in response. Judah ceased her pursuit of Benjamin and irreparable bitterness was avoided. Remarkably and beautifully, in God's providence, when Israel was next divided--between Rehoboam and Jeroboam--Benjamin stood with Judah.

But we learn from this story certain timeless spiritual truths. First, it is the nature of young men to seek to outstrip their elders. It is the nature of sons who love their fathers to try to go twice as far twice as fast as their fathers.

Second, Scripture teaches us that in this tendency lies danger--the danger of junior officers framing the battle and thus governing the course of nations.

Generals must value young warriors like Asahel. They project power, they advance kingdoms, they win battles and wars. Even as Saul seethed at David's "tens of thousands," he knew he needed him.

But often young warriors must be restrained for the greater good. This requires self-denial and faith in God's providence over the outcome of the war. And at times, if a general cannot rein in his warriors he must disavow them. David is forced to do this later with Joab when Joab murders Abner to avenge Asahel

In the course of recent theological conflicts within the Reformed community it has been my impression that too little has been done by generals to restrain younger men. No doubt, generals feel grateful to the bright young men who advance their arguments and champion their cause. Yet if younger warriors are not cautioned and even, at times, held in check by generals, they will most certainly drag their elders and fathers into far wider and more all-consuming battle, the consequence of which will be bitterness between brothers as Abner warned Joab.

Young men have not learned what older men too often forget, that battle is not all of life, and that the day will come, if God is honored in the conflict, when both sides will once again unite in brotherhood. This reunification is much harder to accomplish, of course, when generals fail to govern and limit the course of the conflict.

Tags: 

Growing up Famous....

R. C. Sproul Jr. writes a wonderful little reflection on growing up the son of R. C. Sr. here.

It's not uncommon in the Evangelical/Reformed world for sons of famous fathers to be shipwrecks, or perhaps worse yet, leeches on the body of Christ. And it's hard, at times, not to see something of the ministry of the father in the tragedy of the son.

So R. C. Jr.'s faithful service in the Vineyard is testimony both to his own walk with the Lord and to his father's character.

Tags: 

More on 1 Peter 3

A response from Dr. Leithart to my unattributed quotation from him in my post on 1 Peter 3:21 can be found here.

More could be said on this, but not on a beautiful Memorial Day.

May I add, however, that I did not name Dr. Leithart initially simply because I do not view him as the foremost public advocate of the position I argue against. He is, however, a good writer, and his paragraph seemed the best summation of the view I oppose. There are two other PCA authors I considered quoting whose views are far more colorful and arguable, but use of them would have constituted a form of casuistry I want to avoid.

I tried to be equally fair in quoting from Calvin. There are sections of Calvin's commentary on 1 Peter 3 where, quoted out of context, Calvin could be made to sound entirely Zwinglian. That's not my view, nor is it fair to claim Calvin held a low view of the gracious and incorporative efficacy of baptism.

So, yes, I was quoting Dr. Leithart. Overall, however, as with Doug Wilson, I find Dr. Leithart's statements in these and other areas more nuanced and careful than those of many who claim him as a source of theological inspiration. This was my sole reason for not naming him. Also note his measured response to the Mississippi Valley Presbytery report here.

The Semi-full Counsel of Scripture....

As I read advocates of the (what shall I call it? offense is inevitable...) "new perspective on baptism" within segments of the PCA call for a return to Biblical language in speaking of the sacraments, I wonder to myself which words they're seeking to reclaim.

Are they trying to reclaim all of Scripture's teaching on baptism, or just a subset of that teaching?

It seems to me that those advocating a "return to Biblical language" concerning baptism are perched precariously on knife's edge between Roman Catholic and Baptist views of the sacrament.

On the one hand, they're very near to the washing-of-original-concupiscence, entry-into-the-only-Church view of Roman Catholicism. Though they vehemently deny this, I increasingly view the differentiation they claim in this area as distinction without difference.

On the other hand, of course, if their view of baptism truly is distinct both from both today's majority Presbyterian view and Roman Catholicism, and if it is distinct precisely because it hews closely to "plain Scriptural language" about baptism, then perhaps they are arguing for believer baptism. Because if there is one view that clearly CAN be argued about baptism from the "plain language without resort to preconceived notions or spiritualization" viewpoint, it's the Baptist view...

"Repent, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins." Acts 2:38

"He who has believed and has been baptized shall be saved; but he who has disbelieved shall be condemned." Mark 16:16

Try telling a Baptist that Presbyterian sacramentalists are advocating a simple-meaning, plain-language, no-spiritualizing-Scripture view. To a Baptist, the idea would be patently absurd. Honesty should also compel us to treat such claims as disingenuous.

Senator Santorum's faithful witness to Jesus Christ...

The May 22nd issue of The New York Times Magazine had a very long cover story titled, "The Senator From a Place Called Faith: The coming of Rick Santorum." If you're able, pick up a copy. As the article starts out, it appears it will be one more slash-and-burn treatment of biblical faith, but deeper into the piece it becomes apparent the author, Michael Sokolove, is listening carefully and finding himself surprised by a growing sympathy.

Senator Santorum comes across as one of the bolder witnesses to the Christian faith I've ever seen profiled by a major media player, and it's particularly encouraging to read of his involvement, both legislatively and personally, in helping the poor. The good Senator reminds me of the Apostle Peter's exhortation:

Keep your behavior excellent among the Gentiles, so that in the thing in which they slander you as evildoers, they may because of your good deeds, as they observe them, glorify God in the day of visitation. (1 Peter 2:12)

One item of interest to those who have taken part in the discussion of Roman Catholic theology and practice on this blog is this sad statement:

Santorum is not a reader of Scripture-- "I've never read the Bible cover to cover; maybe I should have" --and has no passages he clings to when seeking spiritual guidance. "I'm a Catholic, so I'm not a biblical scholar. I'm not someone who has verses he can pop out. That's not how I interact with the faith." (emphasis added)

Jesus Christ had "verses he (could) pop out," and He popped them out all the time--one for every occasion. If He was tempted, pop. If he was faced by a murderous mob of religious leaders, pop. If He was giving a sermon on a hillside, pop pop pop pop pop...

Ironically, one of the article's illustrations is a picture of a grouping of the senator's personal effects. Sitting on top of a stack of books in his office is a black Bible with "Rick Santorum, United States Senator" engraved in gold leaf on the lower right corner of the cover.

Leaving this matter to the side, though, Senator Santorum honors God and I'd be proud to be lumped in with him.

Another Terri Schiavo in the Making....

In Jacksonville, Florida, 34-year-old Scott Thomas lives with his mother while his wife, Eliza, fights in court for his legal custody.

Scott and Eliza married in 2001. In 2004 Scott was found on his kitchen floor with a fractured skull and severe brain injuries. Eliza says Scott tripped over the family dog. Doctors reportedly say his injuries are inconsistent with a fall. After two months in a coma, Scott was released from a Jacksonville-area rehabilitation center last week.

According to reports, Eliza intends to place her husband in a northeast Florida hospice for removal of his feeding tube should she be granted custody.

Below is a picture of Scott and a report on a visit with him by David Nees, one of the Christians who came to protest the killing of Terri Schiavo in Pinellas Park.

ScottThomas.jpg

Hi David,

Here is a picture of Scott Thomas, the brain-injured man in Jacksonville whose wife would like custody so that she can pull his feeding tube. The original story is on The Empire Journal and World Net Daily. We spent Monday with Scott and his mom Pamela. This picture is with his doctor, Dr. Thomas Murray of Jacksonville, who is the same doctor who offered free hyperbaric therapy to Terri. Scott gave us a big smile on command, and then a 'thumbs up'. His hearing for guardianship is soon - all the paperwork has to be in to the court by June 3rd. His mom has temporary custody until sometime in June. The judge gave Pamela custody, but gave the wife the right to unsupervised visits with Scott, even though Scott has indicated that he doesn't want to see her, and may be claiming that she caused the original injury. In an interesting twist, his wife was an illegal alien from Poland and she convinced him to marry her back about the time of 9/11 so that she would not get deported. Just thought we'd send it along if you're interested in commenting on it. We have a precedent in Florida, and now we have the next victim.

David and Vickie Nee

God chose what is foolish in the world...

Not long after the "Stealth Bible" issue of World went into print, as the conflict over neutered Bible versions grew in intensity across the evangelical world, Don Carson contacted the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood and asked that his name be removed from the list of those who endorsed the organization. Having neither met nor corresponded with Dr. Carson, I was uncomfortable hearing of his resignation secondhand and not having a chance to discuss his concerns with him directly. (A couple months earlier in addition to my pastorate here in Bloomington I had agreed to serve as CBMW's first Executive Director.)

I called Dr. Carson, introduced myself, and said I'd heard he wanted to remove his endorsement of CBMW. Would he please reconsider his decision?

Men will arise, speaking perverse things...

While pursuing the M.Div. at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, I took four courses from Roger Nicole, including his seminar on the Atonement. Dr. Nicole was a feminist even then (1980-1983), and we had our arguments over his dismissal of Scripture's commands. Yet at that point his feminist commitments extended only to the Church, the advocacy of women pastors and elders, and many of us felt this advocacy was more a function of his baptistic polity and almost-denial of ordination than some deep ideological commitment to feminism. At the time he still did not equivocate on the command of God's Word that the husband is to be the head of the wife. But this inconsistency never led us to feel that Dr. Nicole was essentially stable on this doctrine. Which is greater, the Church or the home?

Skip forward seventeen years or so, to the 1998 meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society. There I was privileged to renew my relationship with Dr. Nicole. Imagine my lack of surprise upon finding out that Dr. Nicole had moved in his commitments--and not towards honoring God and His Word, but rather toward Eleanor Smeal, Mary Stewart Van Leeuwen, "The New York Times," Gilbert Bilezikian, Simone de Beauvoir, Wheaton College, Hillary Clinton, and "Christianity Today."

Dr. Nicole now denied the authority in marriage of the husband...

Fundamentalist Thought

Following a link from a comment on our blog (thanks, Greg) I came to the Sharper Iron web site and blog. I've seen it before. An interesting site dedicated to "providing a place to publish and discuss news and ideas from a Christian, Biblical, Fundamentalist worldview." In some respects, it's modern Puritanism. I don't know where it stands theologically, though they quote Doug Wilson approvingly in one place and link to others from the Reformed world.

All this to bring you a link to another blog...

Tags: 

Books Chosen

Friends: I've chosen and ordered the books you helped me select. I was a little fearful of idiosyncratic choices on this, so I decided to stick with your recommendations. I had thought of adding Ryle's Holiness, but in the end I didn't. What I did order was:

Tags: 

Sunlight on the Internet

Lack of light leads to germs while nothing cleanses more thoroughly than the sun. For these reasons Tim and I publish valid email addresses along with contact information on this blog. We also try to remain actively engaged in the comment sections of our posts rather than just on the main blog page.

We do so because we believe as pastors we must approach all of life pastorally. This medium is not the Christian equivalent of Berkeley's Free Speech Zone. It's a medium to be claimed for Christ. Which means, first, that Tim and I are responsible for what we say here; and second, that this blog is intended to be helpful spiritually to others, not just to burnish our writing skills or public reputations.

We hope those who participate actively or inactively in this blog benefit from the thoughts expressed here--and that the sum of all our words is glory to the Father through the Son.

As part of the discipline of approaching this blog pastorally Tim and I are committed to explaining--and at times defending--what we write in our posts. We want our readers to know who we are, the churches we pastor, how we can be reached and the theological commitments we bring to the table. We do so recognizing that sin is crouching, seeking to devour those who are not just as careful to obey God on the internet as they are in more personal areas of life.

We have seen the effect over time of the anonymity and pseudonymity in the closed discussion lists that are increasingly common on Reformed sites. Even when discussion is open and moderators are identified many Reformed sites degenerate into virtual ghettoes.

The smug, self-referential nature of discussion in such groups produces closed communities where arrogance and vitriol dominate. And because the internet lacks the inherent accountability...

Tags: 

Pages