April 2004

Women Abusing Men

News of American soldiers mistreating Iraqi prisoners is flooding the world. What no one (at least no one in the western media) seems to be commenting on is the peculiarly sexual nature of the abuse--nakedness, simulated sex acts, genital torture.

It's even more sobering to note that in pictures where American soldiers are present, the leering, ridiculing Americans lording it over Iraqi men are women--sometimes with a man standing behind them as though to guard them, but the provocateurs in all the pictures I've seen have clearly been female.

Several striking thoughts arise from this.

First, one of the key arguments against women in the military is the sexual abuse they might suffer if captured. We never considered the possibility that they themselves might inflict sexual abuse on their male captives. It's ironic that sexual mistreatment of POWs has not been common in past male-dominated conflicts. Other forms of POW abuse have been common, but sexual abuse was a relative rarity until women entered the military.

Second, such abuse of men by women puts a visible face on the largely ignored phenomenon of female abusiveness in society as a whole. Feminism teaches that women are nurturing and peace-loving while men are war-like and abusive. Sociological research, however, reveals that women are every bit as likely to mistreat others physically as men. Sin of every sort is equally distributed among the sexes. There is no uniquely male or female form of sin.

Third, is it just me, or does anyone else suspect there's a connection between the general in charge of the unit cited in the abuse of the Iraqi prisoners being a woman and such behaviour? What kind of women want to oversee male prisoners? The kind who would do this kind of sickening deed, I suspect. And in a feminized chain of command such misdeeds are more likely to be winked at.

The feminization of the American military is a tragic crime against God's creation order in which man is called to protect and lay down his life for woman. And we will justly bear His wrath for our rebellion against His will.

All Scripture is God-breathed...

Commenting on my entry, "JPUSA: She's the boss...," a reader wrote, "(I) would be interested to hear your comments on the TNIV and this disturbing gender-neutral trend." To which I respond:

The TNIV is an emendation of the actual Hebrew and Greek text of God's Word, and therefore rebellion against the Holy Spirit Who is the author of that Word. (Similarly, the NRSV, the NIVI, the NLT, etc.) The men marketing these versions have changed thousands of Scripture's words to the end that the patriarchal nature of the Greek and Hebrew text the Holy Spirit inspired will be obscured or removed.

For instance, the Hebrew word 'adam' is used throughout the Old Testament to refer to the whole human race, and by this usage we are reminded ...that Eve's husband, Adam, was our federal head, and that through him all who have ever lived are "conceived in sin," as David put it, and subject to death and hell. As the New England Primer reads, "In Adam's fall, we sinned all."

Changed to reflect the Hebrew of the Old Testament, the Primer's statement would read, "In Adam's fall, adam sinned all." Changed to fit the mold of these gender-neutered Bible products, it would read, "In Adam's and Eve's fall, people sinned all."

Multiply such changes thousands of times across the Old and New Testaments and the radical agenda becomes clear: 'man' becomes 'person,' 'men' becomes 'people,' 'brothers' becomes 'siblings,' and so on.

Those who make these changes deny the changes are ideologically motivated, claiming that they're simply implementing the latest linguistic scholarship used by translators across the world, and that those who oppose these changes are ignorant...

Modern Monks

I was preparing to preach on Luke's account of Martha entertaining Christ (Luke 10:38-42) last week, and, as usual, I read Calvin on the passage first.

I'm fascinated when reading Calvin's commentaries by the incredible variety of passages which stirred up controversy in his day. You wouldn't think the story of Jesus commending Mary and chastising Martha would have any relevance to the debates of the Reformation, but it did.

Why? Because, as Calvin explains, the Roman church had distorted Jesus' commendation of Mary sitting at His feet into a wholesale commendation of the "contemplative life."

Usually we regard practitioners of the contemplative life as the monks and nuns, hermits and cloistered religious of Roman Catholicism. And Calvin does condemn monks in his exposition of this passage, but he adds another, rather unexpected, profession to his list of those who have perverted this passage...

Practice hospitality without complaining...

Christian homes aren't for show, but for ministry and love. If we obey God's Word and "practice hospitality," it would be perverse for us to use that hospitality as an occasion to preen. Such behavior is the opposite of what Scripture commands:

Be devoted to one another in brotherly love; give preference to one another in honor; not lagging behind in diligence ...contributing to the needs of the saints, practicing hospitality. (Romans 12:10-13)

We are to welcome those who cannot repay us (Luke 14:13,14), seating them around our tables and sharing with them the love and joy God has brought into our families. If our glasses get broken and our carpets stained, it should increase our resolve to be faithful to the biblical command to practice hospitality "without complaining" (1Peter 4:9).

Never in history have Christians had the kitchens, dining room tables, chairs, food, or leisure we have today, but as our wealth increases our hospitality seems to decrease. This ought not to be: "To whom much is given, much shall be required."

Brothers and sisters, when did you last have the poor, crippled, lame or blind over for dinner--anyone other than relatives? Husbands, do you have a godly wife who wants to wash the feet of the saints but she's married to a boor who is unwilling to share his table?

In her excellent book, "Open Heart, Open Home," Karen Mains points out that true hospitality doesn't vaunt itself. Rather, without pretension it aims at making others feel "at home." Look at your home and ask yourself why God has given you such riches? Is it only to satisfy a romantic daydream of life as it used to be?

When reporting a story for The New Yorker several years ago, I found that the less people cook, the more money they spend on cooking appliances. Like the people who stood in line to buy my cookbook, people bought professional-grade ranges in the hope that they would one day use them.

It should not have been surprising when, in the final decade of the twentieth century, food writers became the voice of an idealized past, issuing bulletins from a land where pies cooled perpetually on windowsills.

-Molly O'Neill, "Food Porn," Columbia Journalism Review 42, no. 3 (September/October 2003): 45.

JPUSA: She's the boss...

Last night I looked over Jesus People USA's (JPUSA) annual brochure promoting Cornerstone, the closest thing the evangelical world has to Woodstock. I noted with sadness that evangelicals' cultural enslavement proceeds apace. It's time to write and ask to be taken off JPUSA's mailing list, ending a close-to-thirty-year friendship with these old freaks.

JPUSA's brochure announces that a whole phalanx of evangelical feminists will be available to indoctrinate the youngsters, oldsters, and hipsters who show up to camp out and listen to Glenn Kaiser, his Rez Band, and friends. Christians for Biblical Equality is being provided big-top exposure.

Years ago, I rejoiced in JPUSA's counter-cultural witness in my home town, Chicago, and I encouraged church members to visit their inner-city intentional community, working and worshipping with them and catching their vision for ministries of compassion. But as the decades passed...

A natural law witness within western culture...

This interview of Budziszewski, one of Marvin Olasky's colleagues at University of Texas, is quite helpful--particularly in the context of reformed pastors and elders abdicating their authority in the civil realm, generally; and most recently with regard to sodomy and sodomite (non) marriage. But more on this later.

As one of those reformed pastors, I haven't yet nailed down where, exactly, I stand on natural law (and I know I'm pretty old to be writing that). Still, as we're surrounded by the crumbling foundations of the West, I'm gaining sympathy and think, regardless of the reader's own position, he'll profit from this interview and be better able to articulate the Lordship of Jesus Christ over all creation.

Of course, by posting this interview I'm not at all commending the recent (Easter) conversion of Dr. Budziszewski and his wife to Roman Catholicism.

Contra Neuhaus, Colson, and their comrades-at-ambiguity known as Evangelicals and Catholics Together, little things like the cult of Mary, the unique authority of Scripture, imputation, and justification keep getting in the way of rapprochement. Nor do I agree with Budziszewski's recommendation that Christians place a decreasing emphasis on the testimony of Scripture in witnessing to our culture, and a correlative increase in the testimony of natural law. In fact, there are a number of things I wish Budziszewski hadn't said. Still, there's much more I'm glad he said and find wise and helpful.

And while I'm at it, I am well aware how many readers of "World," and thus of Worldblogs, are Roman Catholic--in fact, here as I write, I find that a recent comment posted on this blog is by a dear brother in Christ who, many years ago, first introduced me to much of what I have come to hold dear in my life--a scepticism concerning the use of birth control to separate the unitive and procreative functions of the marriage bed; a parallel belief that children are one of God's chief blessings; a fatherly (and I must admit, somewhat haphazard) practice of praying over my children as they go to bed each night; a conviction that it is an act of piety and holiness to battle against false shepherds; a love of the writing of G.K. Chersterton and Joe Sobran; and so much more--all this happened one night when my wife, Mary Lee, and I sat for hours at John and Molly Archibold's dinner table, watching, listening, and learning. One night, and then we moved to Massachusetts and, decades later, the Archibolds moved from the Episcopal to the Roman Catholic Church. But we continue to love the Archibolds, and to look toward that day when we will have completely transparent fellowship in the Presence of our Lord.

Note: At the very bottom of the piecce, you'll find appended the extended section of Calvin's Institutes Budziszewski (briefly) quots in the first half of the interview.

Sticks and stones may break my bones...

Call a man "racist," "sexist," or "homophobic" and you've won the argument. Such charges are never meant to further the debate, but to end it.

And if you're the one being smeared, don't try to slip the noose. You'll only make things worse. Pity the schlimazel who protests, "Some of my best friends are gay." The hoots will drown out his words.

Now it seems the Holocaust Industry has succeeded in trivializing the charge of "anti-Semitism," also. Thus the New York Times reports the 2002 reprint of Merriam-Webster's unabridged Third New International Dictionary defines "anti-Semitism" as follows:

First definition: "hostility toward Jews as a racial or religious minority group"

Second definition: "opposition to Zionism: sympathy with opponents of the state of Israel."

This second definition only provides formal documentation for what has been evident for some time--that those who criticize Israel's foreign and domestic policies or call into question the smallest detail of U.S. support for Israel are in danger of joining Joe Sobran and Pat Buchanan on the black list of those publicly smeared as "anti-Semitic." (For more on this, check out this link to Joe Sobran's newsletter, specifically the essay halfway down titled "The Obsession.")

That the Gray Lady herself carried this item is ironic given that no institution has done more to stiffle debate over American foreign policy toward Israel than the New York Times. She's the center of what Pat Buchanan refers to as "Israel's Amen Corner."

[Nunberg, Geoffrey. "What the Good Book Says: Anti-Semitism, Loosely Defined" New York Times, Sunday, 11 April 2004, "Week in Review," p. 7.]

I am the resurrection and the life...

Here on Easter Eve, as I prepare for Easter morning worship, a call comes from Africa to tell us that Mpaulo, the little boy our daughter, Michal, spent much of the past three months cuddling and loving, just died. (Here's a picture of the two of them posted by my son, Joseph, on his Worldmag blog.)

Two days ago, Michal and her dear friend, Annie Walker, left Ndola, Zambia, for London, where they will spend a short time before returning home. Michal had set her heart on having her elder sister and her husband, Heather and Archie Ummel, adopt Mpaulo, and some of you may have received an email from Heather and Archie, or me, asking if you might be able to help us with information concerning the five other Zambian children adopted by US citizens in the past year.

Many of you gave of your time and prayers to this end, and despite considerable setbacks, as Michal and Annie left Ndola we were all hopeful for the eventual adoption of Mpaulo and his reunion with Michal, Annie, and the rest of his new Covenant family.

But God is gracious, and saw fit to answer our prayers in another way.

My dear brother in Christ, David Wegener, called to tell us of Mpaulo's death and will see to the funeral arrangements and service. (In fact, it's likely that beyond two of the women from the orphanage, David, his wife, Terri, and their children Elizabeth, Mary, Sarah, and Jonathan will be the only ones present to mourn Mpaulo's passing.)

Yes, I know Mpaulo is one among millions of little orphans with no father and mother to comfort and care for them, but God placed this little boy in our hearts and we are grieving his death.

When I called Michal just now, I told her I was searching for the verse that says God takes the lives of some to protect them from coming evil. I said I thought it was somewhere in Isaiah. Through her tears she responded, "Isaiah 57:1."

Sure enough:

The righteous man perishes, and no man takes it to heart; And devout men are taken away, while no one understands. For the righteous man is taken away from evil, He enters into peace; They rest in their beds, Each one who walked in his upright way.

If Augustine could ask his readers to pray for his mother, may I follow him in asking for prayer for our daughter, Michal, as well as the others who loved and cared for Mpaulo--the Wegeners, Annie Walker, the women of Ndola's Transient Home for Children, and Doug and Heather Ummel?

May the Lord be pleased to add an orphanage in Africa, filled with the love of Jesus Christ and called, "Mpaulo's Home." And may He be pleased, also, to give many of His people the grace to follow Him in being a father to the fatherless.

I am so grateful our Lord allowed Mpaulo to spend the last few weeks of his life being carried around in a chitenga on the backs of women and girls who loved Jesus, and therefore loved him.

Home sweet Rome...

Responding to my entry, Not Just Now, Thank You, dealing with the conversion to Roman Catholicism of many of my peers from Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, Greg Barnes writes:

I suspect that many of those who are converting to Rome are like so many who convert to Mormonism, in that they know very little about what they are getting into. It also shows a defect in the curriculum of whatever seminaries and Bible colleges those preachers attended...

And Pastor Paul McCain writes:

Tim, we've suffered a few diversions ourselves. Not too many though. Perhaps some of the more notorious conversions would include Richard John Neuhaus... and Jaroslav Pelican who headed East. ....What do you think accounts for it? I've identified it as a longing for some sense of "security" which is gladly provided in the "magisterium" of Rome... Your thoughts?

To which I respond:

Without getting too specific, whatever may be said about the rest of the Gordon-Conwell converts, no one would accuse Scott or Kimberly Hahn of being ignorant of what they were getting into. Scott and Kimberly were (and are) both bright ones, and would have known exactly what they were doing. On more than one occasion, I was very pleased to have Kimberly standing with me when I was arguing with Professor Roger Nicole in his advocacy of the ordination of women. And Kimberly's husband, Scott, was the cutting edge of theonomy's entrance into our campus who, like every other proponent of theonomy I've known, was no dullard.

Neuhaus is an interesting and, I think, instructive case. When he converted to Roman Catholicism he sent a number of us a letter explaining his action and I here quote what I found most telling, and have since resonated with:

Not just now, thank you...

If you read Roman Catholic publications of the more fervent variety, you may have run across accounts of the notorious rate of conversions suffered by my own alma mater, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary. It's hard to keep track of exactly how many of my fellow graduates have made the pilgrimage to "home sweet Rome," but four of the more prominent I know personally, including Scott and Kimberly Hahn, Steve Wood, and Marcus Grodi. Stories of these conversions are found all over the web and some of the details are not quite accurate--but more on that later.

Prior to the land being purchased and turned into a Protestant seminary, Gordon-Conwell's campus had housed a Roman Catholic (Carmelite) boys school whose purpose was to facilitate vocations to the priesthood. Meeting one of Gordon-Conwell's Roman Catholic converts, Fr. Schevers (who formerly taught at the boy's school) suggested that the prayers of their Carmelite predecessors were the reason so many Gordon-Conwell graduates coverted. (For an interesting, albeit Roman Catholic, account of these conversions, see the Spring 1996 issue of Sursum Corda!, 1331 Red Cedar Circle, Ft. Collins, CO 80524.)

Despite my gratitude for much of the work undertaken by Rome to witness against the moral cesspool flooding our Western world, I had to chuckle recently when I received a letter from Marcus Grodi asking me to give money to his non-profit, The Coming Home Network, to facilitate the conversion of additional Protestant pastors. I do hope Marc isn't holding his breath.

Some excerpts:

March, 2004.
Let me introduce you to the Coming Home Network. We're a lay Catholic apostolate that has helped hundreds of Protestant ministers convert to the Catholic faith. And right now, we're helping 200 more who are on the journey to Rome. Each one of these pastors faces a severe personal crisis, and I'm short of funds to help them all. Please read this important letter and consider helping us help more Protestant clergy convert to the Catholic faith. You may be their only hope!

Dear Fellow Catholic,

Hello. My name is Marcus Grodi. I'm a former Protestant minister who converted to the catholic faith nine years ago.

As you probably know, a large number of Protestant ministers have converted to Catholicism in the last decade. You may have heard their stories on my weekly live television program, Journeys Home, on EWTN.

But what you might not know is that hundreds of Protestant ministers are currently "on their way home" to Rome.

Shame's guest appearance in New York Times...

Some questions answer themselves.

Question: I am going to my first gay wedding, the "I do"'s of my nephew and his companion. But the whole idea of a grand, gay wedding ceremony and reception seems to me to be an open call for a topsy-turvy mad hatter's tea party. Which one is the bride? Am I a member of the bride's family or the groom's? Who dances with the father first? Who throws the bouquet? Who is eligible to catch it? And, frankly, I have never actually seen two men kiss in person. Don't you suppose there will be some kind of kiss at the altar to seal the deal? The entire prospect makes me nervous, and when I am nervous, I tend to get the giggles and say very silly things. Should I just stay home?

-Anonymous, "Dear Editor...William Norwich Contemplates Some Recently Posited Style-and-Entertaining-Related Questions." New York Times Magazine, 28 March 2004, p. 78.