Reflections on my Baptist upbringing...

(My friend Bob Patterson sent me this tribute to his parents and childhood church. I thought it would be helpful to us all, so I asked Bob for permission to post it. Thank you, dear brother. I wish I'd known your Dad and Mom. - TB)

When I returned to my hometown of Cherry Hill, New Jersey, to lay my mother to rest in 2010, the memorial service and subsequent luncheon for family and friends brought back a lot of memories. Held at the same Baptist church where my parents were married and all five of their children were baptized—and where we offered praise to God for my father’s life less than eight years before—my mother’s funeral not only signaled the passing of an era but also compelled me to reflect about all my parents gave to me.

My parents were typical members of the World War II generation. They were high-school sweethearts whose lives were interrupted by the war; for my father, that meant time in the Navy and V-12 program at Tufts, where he earned an engineering degree. They settled not far from where they both grew up, in the close-in Jersey suburbs of Philadelphia. While Dad worked more than 40 years at PECO, a public utility in Center City, Mom gave him five healthy children between 1947 and 1962, whom they raised in a modest Cape Cod that remained the family homestead until after my father’s passing.

Central to their lives was unwavering devotion to the humble church where they started their life together: Erlton Community Baptist Church. It was the first congregation, Catholic or Protestant, established in what would be become a sprawling township of housing developments and a famous shopping mall, but it served an older neighborhood with a mix of families from the literally dirt poor to the college-educated and everything in between. The church exerted a strong presence in the community... as it was nestled within walking distance of 500 homes. A softball field in the back of the church offered options for social functions, not to mention a needed playground for nearby families. I still remember, as an elementary-school student, walking from school to church every Wednesday for a Bible-enrichment program and for choir practice on Fridays.

My father was a spiritual force at church and home. A well-read layman, he respected many aspects of Reformed theology even as he remained a Baptist and a mild dispensationalist. He was not a fundamentalist, as he loved to dance and took us to the movies. He could make a persuasive case for the Christian faith and did so when the opportunity arose. An Ivy-League educated Jewish neighbor once admitted having been convinced that Jesus is the Messiah after a bull session with my dad, even though he could not bring himself to break with his extended family.

Both Mom and Dad shared an understanding of the Lord’s Day that would make any confessional Protestant smile: After Sunday school and morning worship, we came home for a big dinner, at times with the grandparents, only to return to church a few hours later for youth group and evening worship. They were not strict Sabbatarians; when my mother was pregnant with No. 5, we started eating out for Sunday dinner, occasionally running into the Rev. Carl McIntire—dressed in tails, his preaching attire—at the same restaurant. But Sunday was clearly special; nothing got in the way of our sacred routine, even when on vacation. Even apart from Sunday, my parents got the big picture right and made it clear to all their children that serving Christ takes precedence over everything else.

As one who adopted the Reformed tradition in his early 20s, and reared his three children on the Shorter Catechism, my return to Erlton Baptist led me to ponder whether I had done the right thing in leaving my roots. Not that Christians should never switch denominations; my mother left the Catholic church of her upbringing to become a Baptist in her early 20s, and not out of theological conviction but simply because she and her mother found our Baptist church easier to get to than the Catholic church in the next town. They also liked the founding pastor who paid them a visit when he started his ministry.

But I remain in awe of the remarkable strength of the Christian community in which I was raised. Our 300-member Baptist church in many respects represented a stronger ministry than many Presbyterian churches today with double the membership. Our church featured the basics: preaching, teaching, and pastoral care. We had only one full-time pastor who delivered two different sermons on the Lord’s Day, yet the church maintained—thanks to volunteers, not paid staffers—a strong educational and youth program, including a memorable two-week DVBS where we learned the Apostles’ Creed among other things. Moreover, Erlton offered a children’s choir program that taught us how to read music, how to sing hymns, and how to behave in public worship, which was decidedly traditional and where school-aged children participated with their parents. “Small groups” that are all the rage today were not a part of the vocabulary. Instead, covered-dish suppers and men’s breakfasts, along with the annual mother-daughter banquet and Sunday-school picnic, reinforced the church as an intergenerational community.

I cannot help wonder why this kind of basic, mid-sized church has not been widely replicated among Reformed folk today. Perhaps because my wife and I have struggled to root our family in a stable church home—while living in transient Northern Virginia where Presbyterian options are slim—this question is also personal. I fear we have not given our three children all that my parents gave me.

For certain, we live in a very different society today, one than looks down upon the postwar era of our parents. The things I cherish about my childhood are due less to Baptist distinctives than to the profound social conservatism of the time when churches, Baptist or Presbyterian, had little difficulty filling their pews, nurseries, Sunday schools, and youth fellowships. The child- and family-centeredness of that generation paid huge dividends that enabled the church to function as a normative institution, one that commanded a level of respect even among unbelievers. Churches were not enterprises; nor did they need “mission” or “vision” statements or high-paid consultants telling them how to reach their neighborhoods. My church was the neighborhood.

The irony is that while evangelical personalities, parachurch organizations, and megachurches strive to be relevant, rooted Christian communities are hard to find. The sociological factors quantifying these shifts are indeed complex. But for Reformed folk, the lessons suggest that something paramount has been broken, something that all the gospel coalitions, alliances, and global networks cannot put back together; in fact, these constructs may undermine the development of the robust social capital that our ordinary, bourgeois churches embodied in the mid-20th century. We may have our Tim Kellers and John Pipers, but in light of the current social and cultural disorder, I’d prefer to see more seemingly insignificant churches like Erlton Baptist that made their mark on families like mine.

—Robert W. Patterson

Comments

Amen.

I was relieved to find that this was a "my birth church was good" essay rather than "the ways in which my birth church was rotten". Both have their place, but this kind of praise is all too rare with sound Christians. 

A friend of mine thinks that whenever a church has to go to a second morning service, they are too big, and need to plant another church.  I did grow up in a birth church that was not and is not bible believing as we'd understand it, but the one thing I love to see on the occasions I have to return is the spirit of service and community that is there.  I currently attend the big city center conservative Presbyterian church in my town, and I think we do a great job of encouraging service and fellowship for a church our size...but still, we hire folks to cook, we hire folks to clean, we hire folks to do the grass, and sometimes it feels to me like being in college...we cloister ourselves off in our comfortable little upper-middle class community and read all the books and attend all the bible studies in the world, but our hands don't get very dirty.  My own hands included.  I loved this piece, for the same reason I love going to my bible study that is led by an engineer who isn't the most eloquent man in the world--because I think it is good for us as followers in Jesus to follow and be led by and to encourage the humble and small.

Our church featured the basics: preaching, teaching, and pastoral care.

What about right administration of the sacraments?  I think the OPC gets it right when they say "The Reformers are clear: Where the word of God is truly preached and taught, the sacraments rightly administered, and church discipline faithfully exercised, there the one true holy and apostolic church is present."  I'd think those were the basics.  I know what I think you're trying to say and I'm sympathetic to a good portion of it but the Reformers were right.

You mean ordinances, David?  :^)  We Baptists do 'em, and I'm sure Mr. Patterson's boyhood church did, too.

You mean ordinances, David?  :^)  We Baptists do 'em, and I'm sure Mr. Patterson's boyhood church did, too.

No, I mean what the OPC said.  And regrettably Baptists do not rightly administer them, at least generally although apparently there are a few Baptists who recognize that they receive Christ's body and blood in the Lord's Supper although I never grew up seeing that.  And Baptists withhold baptism from their children, by definition.

And part of my comment was simply that he did not consider one of the three marks of the church to be part of the "basics."

Mr. Patterson, where are you in Northern VA?

Miss Nugent -- Leesburg.

David -- It was my oversight not to mention the right administration of the sacraments. With the late John Haddon Leith ("The Reformed Imperative"), I fully agree that the Reformers offered "no program for the church other than the preaching and teaching of the Word of God, administering the sacraments, and providing pastoral care." Although my church did not call them sacraments, the Erlton church functioned as if they were: upholding baptism and Holy Communion as important rites instituted by Christ -- and administering them regularly. Even as the church did not baptize infants of believing parents, it nonetheless required a trinitarian baptism for membership and for participating in the Lord's Supper. Moreover, Erlton did not insist that all candidates for membership be immersed as adults but accepted candidates, like my mother, who received baptism as infants in other churches. The church also taught that all three things (baptism, church membership, and the Lord's Supper) were not incidental but essential to the Christian life. True, it may not have gotten every detail about baptism exactly right as defined by the Westminster standards, but the church got a lot more things right than it got wrong. So I don't want to let the perfect be the enemy of the good. I remain persuaded that Erlton Baptist was a visible expression of the true church.

Dear Bob, 

I might add the adjective "powerful" before "visible" in the final sentence of your most recent comment. 

At least so it sounds to this reader. 

Thank you for this tribute. It's moving and encouraging. 

David Bayly 

Dear Bob,

Thank you so much for this helpful picture of an older faithful church. For some reason nowadays a church that functions in this way is frequently considered a cult and I all too often begin to see things backwards myself. I start to envy other churches with their paid staff. I'm so thankful for the community of our church; may I also embrace the work that God gives us through all the families, the building He has blessed us with, etc.

~Heather (Bayly) Ummel

David, I might add that even conservative Presbyterian churches do not always get the sacraments right or follow their own Book of Order. When I was a member of Fourth Presbyterian Church in Bethesda, Maryland -- considered perhaps a cathedral church of the EPC -- I saw a baptism that was administered only in the name of Jesus (no trinitarian formula). Moreover, the church at times carried out during public worship "dedications" of the infants of believers, not baptisms, even as there is no basis for such practice in the EPC Directory of Worship or in the Westminster standards.

David, I might add that even conservative Presbyterian churches do not always get the sacraments right or follow their own Book of Order

Absolutely right and they should be called on it.  At least when Baptists are in error in some of these matters they are being faithful to what their church professes.  I'd rather have that than having the right theoretical commitments covered with a veneer of hypocrisy.

Reading this piece, the telling thought was how strong a community that church was. If dispensationalist or Reformed churches have people in them who by all rights should be down the road in the local A/G, or Pentecostal churches have in them people who should be down the road at the local cessationist/fundamentalist church ... then it becomes a very powerful reminder of the way in which community can sometimes trump theology. To the frustration of pastors everywhere!

Add new comment