Washington D.C.'s rebellion against the authority of God and man...
Is President Obama's nationalized health care a violation of our U.S. Constitution?
Of course. You have to have a law degree not to know that. The Tenth Amendment reads, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." And in United States vs. Darby, SCOTUS yawned:
The (Tenth) amendment states but a truism that all is retained which has not been surrendered. There is nothing in the history of its adoption to suggest that it was more than declaratory of the relationship between the national and state governments as it had been established by the Constitution before the amendment or that its purpose was other than to allay fears that the new national government might seek to exercise powers not granted, and that the states might not be able to exercise fully their reserved powers.....
So now Obamacare brings one-fifth of of our economy inside the Beltway. If such a monstrous grab of authority and power is no violation of the Tenth Amendment, nothing is or could be. To argue our national rulers can usurp authority over one-fifth of our economy because they have the authority to tax the people is the sort of lunacy... we've come to expect from SCOTUS and it's a wonder there's any subject other than SCOTUS being lampooned by late night comedians.
If you believe in respect for authority because you're a Christian, you should honor the authority of your U.S. Constitution by calling for the impeachment of all those members of SCOTUS who voted to uphold nationalized health care. When a subordinate authority violates its higher authority again and again, decade after decade, those who acquiesce rather than using the constitutional means to reform the subordinate authority become responsible for that subordinate authority's rebellion.
But beyond the question of whether nationalized health care is constitutional, we have another question even more important: is President Obama's nationalized health care good?
No. It's evil. And let me add this is the same word used by a German Ph.D. married to a German M.D. to describe Germany's national health care when I asked about it a few years ago. The Ph.D. responded, "It's evil."
Since Roe vs. Wade, the Supreme Court of these United States has given your underage daughter the right to murder her child without either the knowledge or permission of her father or mother. And now President Obama has further attacked the authority of your home by granting your underage daughter the right to be sterilized without either the knowledge or permission of her father or mother.
Understand that Washington D.C. is lawless. When the U.S. Constitution and the authority of parents over their children are attacked on such a fundamental level as murder and sterilization, the rule of law has ended and it's time for something like impeachment or secession or--you tell me?