Escondido Theology, NSA spies, and the persecution of Christians...

The brave members of the Escondido Theology R2K Sanhedrin out at Westminster Seminary (Escondido) wage war against pastors and elders who warn their flocks and neighbors about the growing bloodshed and totalitarianism of these United States. Old people are regularly murdered, little babies are subject to the wholesale slaughter protected by SCOTUS and all its law enforcement apparatus, these evils will only grow under Obamacare's nationalized healthcare...

Meanwhile the R2K Sanhedrin is desperate to silence all those Reformed voices speaking out against the Third Reichification of nursing homes and hospitals and Ethical Review Committees.

You have, of course, noticed all those Reformed pastors and elders speaking out against the Third Reichification of our hospitals and nursing homes, haven't you? Likely you yourself have a Reformed pastor or session in your own community that regularly pickets your county nursing home. Your hospital. A graduate of Covenant Theological Seminary who writes letters to your state's board of medical ethics...

You do have a Reformed church in your city--even one--that does something the R2K Sanhedrin thinks they shouldn't do, right? You do know a Reformed pastor who uses his church's pulpit to denounce your governor or mayor, don't you? A Reformed church session who has written your city council to complain about their taxpayer dollars being used to fund Planned Parenthood's infant slaughter?

What? You've never heard of any such action on the part of any Reformed pastor or church session anywhere in the country? You've got to be kidding me!

You say you've begged your pastor to warn his flock against falling into the murder of their Grandma Does or their unmarried daughter's unborn child, and he's refused? He won't even mention it in the safe confines of his own congregation's private sanctuary? He says he's not going to polarize his congregation? He's not going to stray from that straight and narrow path of robes and liturgy and erudite pulpiteering on the thirty-three abuses of God's Moral Law?

Well, your pastor must be the exception proving the rule.

Surely we must be surrounded by Reformed pastors and churches warning us of the moral and spiritual dangers of the riot of bloodshed that has taken over these United States of America. We must be engulfed, inundated, positively drowning in Reformed men with M.Divs from Westminster and Reformed and Covenant who are known for prostituting their pastoral and Gospel calling to political sectarianism!

It must be everywhere.

But of course, I'm joking. Even if we thought the Escondido Theology R2K storm troopers were right in calling down fire from Heaven on pastors betraying their Gospel calling for politics, we'd look around and wonder where on earth these pastors and sessions are? I mean I have a pretty broad knowledge of the Reformed church in these United States and, for the life of me, I can't think of even a single church anywhere that lets out a peep about politics or takes the first step toward clothing the naked public square as righteous Lot did.

These R2K men working hard to gag Reformed pastors and elders really have no one at all to gag. And they know it.

Rather, they exist to legitimate the universal behavior among Reformed pastors and sessions of absolute silence over the mass bloodshed and growth of secular totalitarianism prevailing across our country.

Their cries of "Wolf!" serve the purpose of covering the naked cowardice of Reformed men's silence with fig leaves of principle. There is no danger anywhere of Reformed pastors and elders betraying their Gospel calling for prophetic witness in the public square. Even if it were wrong, not to worry because such men don't exist. We are all comfortably numb and it's so very nice to have the R2K Sanhedrin elucidating for us how very principled we are in our cowardice.


Last night, I read a story in Wired detailing how our government has thrown out legal checks against spying on citizens of these United States in its surveillance of phone conversations, e-mail, and everything digital. Specifically, the NSA is building huge buildings and working towards exaflop, zettaflop, and yottalop supercomputers to assist its normal work of spying on everyone and everything around the world, including you and me.

One of Wired's sources for the piece is William Binney who worked for decades at the top level of the super-secret NSA as a senior crypto-mathematician responsible "for automating the agency's worldwide eavesdropping network. ...the 68-year-old spent nearly four decades breaking codes and finding new ways to channel billions of private phone calls and email messages from around the world into the NSA's bulging databases. As chief and one of the two cofounders of the agency's Signals Intelligence Automation Research Center... Binney left the NSA in late 2001, shortly after the agency launched its warrantless-wiretapping program." Binney states:

They violated the Constitution setting it up. But they didn't care. They were going to do it anyway, and they were going to crucify anyone who stood in the way. When they started violating the Constitution, I couldn't stay.

Verizon was also a part of the program...and that greatly expanded the volume of calls subject to the agency's domestic eavesdropping.

That multiplies the call rate by at least a factor of five. So you're over a billion and a half calls a day.

Following the above quote, Wired reports, "Spokespeople for Verizon and AT&T said their companies would not comment on matters of national security."

"Once the communications are intercepted and stored, the datamining begins."

"You can watch everybody all the time with transactions or travel or anything. ...Thus, as data like bookstore receipts, bank statements, and commuter toll records flow in, the NSA is able to paint a more and more detailed picture of someone's life. The NSA also has the capability to eavesdrop on phone calls directly and in real time."

Sitting in a restaurant not far from NSA headquarters... Binney held his thumb and forefinger close together:

"We are, like, that far from a turnkey totalitarian state."

Of course, yesterday in a hearing on Capitol Hill where he was questioned concerning Wired's allegations, NSA chief Keith Alexander said no, no, never ever, and absolutely not.

Forbes concludes its report of Alexander's denial:

Don’t expect a more detailed response from the NSA to Bamford’s (Wired) story. The fact that Alexander doesn’t even know how to pronounce the name of the journalist who has written three definitive books on his agency’s history demonstrates how little accountability NSA feels to its critics. Instead, the agency’s parallel realities–-one described from its official sources and another by the whistleblowers emerging from behind its classified walls–-will likely keep diverging.

Brothers and sisters, we are citizens of a representative constitutional democracy with heavy privileges and duties that flow from that system of government. We are not under a Roman Emporer. We are under ourselves and we ourselves have the legal duty to guard the commons God has been pleased to bequeath to us from the hard work and shed blood of our faithful Reformed forefathers who created these United States.

If we learn anything from the Early Church under the Roman Empire, it's that empires like Rome and the Secular West must oppress and kill every Christian who believes all authority in Heaven and earth has been given to the Lord Jesus and we must go and make disciples of all nations, teaching them to obey everything He commanded knowing He is with us to the end of the earth.

Intolleristas are bloodthirsty for exclusivists. It was this way with the Early Church under Rome and it's this way with the Late Church under Western Secularism. Separation of church and state is the death of Christian evangelism and discipleship unless Christian evangelism and discipleship becomes as vapid as the R2K monomaniacs.

Christian life, worship, evangelism, and discipleship are utterly incompatible with Western Secularism's pluralism. Every single time a man under the Lordship of Jesus Christ tries to clothe our naked public squares, he will be shouted down by those convinced they don't have gods and they don't worship and they are as broad-minded and tolerant as can be.

And if that man escapes the priests and priestesses of tolerance, on the way home he'll be cornered by the R2K Sanhedrin who will beat the tar out of him for giving Reformed copaceticdom a bad name.

Tim Bayly

Tim serves Clearnote Church, Bloomington, Indiana. He and Mary Lee have five children and fifteen grandchildren.


God's Moral Law is just a schoolmaster to lead you to Christ.
Don't you know that? ;-)

Thankful for my elders.

May God bless the work of their hands and yours.

I completely agree with your post, but I have to admit I'm confused why you kept criticizing 'Reformed' pastors, and not just pastors at large. I fail to see how views of predestination/election factor into our duty to speak the truth in defense of the unborn, for example.

I imagine money is probably the root of many pastors unwillingness to upset their mega apple cart with talk of politics. No?

>>I have to admit I'm confused why you kept criticizing 'Reformed' pastors, and not just pastors at large.

Dear Mr. Bloomer,

Likely I speak of Reformed pastors and elders because the heterodox R2K men focus on silencing Reformed pastors and elders.


My whole life has been in reformed presbyterian churches, and I agree with so much of your point here. I am, at the same time, reasonably wary of pastors who do the very things you mention, because for years I was in a church in which this was a focus-if not the identity-of the church. Accompanying the pastor's "strong stand" against the very real evils in our local and federal governments were schism, lack of love, pastoral abuse of congregants and family members, etc. Ecclesiastical tyrants railing against civic tyrants ain't a recipe for blessing.

I do hope that *Godly* pastors will be raised up to combat these evils.

I'm very blessed to have aPCA pastor who speaks out almost every week on helping and standing up for the least of these. Who are these they are the unborn, the little children, the orphans and widow, the social outcast.
From his sermon last week on Matthew 25 he said" I was an unborn baby, and you stood up for me. You met my mother at the entrance of an obortuary and begged her to reconsider. You refused to vote for political candidates or parties that backed abortion. In every way possible, you fought for my eight to live."
If my PCA pastor in Michigan would have said this half of the congregation would have walked out.

Thank you for being faithful.

I am unconvinced that this sentiment is consistent with chapter twenty of the WCF. May a church obligate members to vote for a particular candidate? Certainly not.

What if a pro-abortion candidate was right on every other issue, and was running against a pro-life candidate who supported other unbiblical things.

In which direction would you bind their conscience?

The conscience of your church members, that is.

Dear Neoz,

I've thought at great length about your question. It started when I realized that a number of Christians that I know and am close to were planning to vote for Obama. I was not impressed. Your argument was raised more particularly in asking me how I could vote for a man who was "belligerent" and intent on foreign wars. I was not and am not in favor of most of our foreign military involvement, yet I could easily say that opposing abortion is far more important than opposing our foreign wars, even if all of them are unjust. All you have to do is compare the numbers to see this.

We will always be voting for sinners--men who do and support many wrong things. But certainly we cannot assign moral equivalence between working to end poverty (which is impossible according to Jesus) and working to end abortion.

Do you have a problem with pastors who urged their congregation to oppose those promoting death camps in Germany? Or do you look back and have a problem with those who were silent? Do you have a problem with those pastors that urged their congregation to oppose slavery? Or do you have a problem with those who refused to address it because it was "too politically charged"?

We look back with shock that Christians in Germany didn't have their priorities straight. They were willing to silently accept the murder of millions?!?!? What was WRONG with them? Surely you wouldn't respond, "But don't you realize that the other political parties also had sins?"

Our nation has had the equivalent of numerous Nazi holocausts in the last 4 decades. It's morally reprehensible. It's far worse than anything else our nation does. It overrides all other concerns. It makes the wickedness of slavery pale in comparison. It makes our unjust wars look laughably innocent. All of this is because of the sheer numbers of murders taking place.

In Christ,

I think Bayly(s) just need a hug, as this post is laughable and could only be taken seriously by someone in need of affirmation. I will do that digitally: "It is gonna be okay. There are no monsters in your closet, now please, let daddy go back to sleep, but I'll give you a hug first."

You're right Mr. Calamari:

"Tranquil in the Day of Battle"
There is no spiritual warfare
No little ones being slaughtered
No wickedness in high places
No need to sound the alarm
No guilt to repent of
Everything's fine
And tomorrow will be like today, only more so
The need of the moment is to sheathe our swords
And go back to sleep

Thank you for teaching us.

Add new comment