Church officers and fathers who cover up sexual crimes...
"Fathers need to know this: avoiding the potential shame by not providing justice for your daughter is a cowardly act that will be forever remembered..." - longtime PCA elder and father of little daughters just found to have been raped by a relative
Here's an e-mail we received responding to the post "With the souls of sodomites destroyed, children are next...". As you will see, the e-mail is filled with horrors--particularly the horror of Christians who refuse to recognize the horrors taking over our homes and churches and to respond to them Biblically.
Since posting this and the previous piece, it's become clear to me that readership of this post has been small. And I believe this means sexual sin and the rampant fornication and pornography that are its seedbed will live on in the church, gaining ground while church officers and household fathers abandon their flocks and talk exchange blog posts and comments about family-centered churches and post-millenialism.
The predators love this.
So please, look again at the pull-quote at the top and ask yourself if you and your church officers are beyond it? If you're such good fathers, pastors, elders, deacons, and Titus 2 women that you don't need to find out what it means or how to respond to this failure of fathers filling our churches with bitterness? I'm sure no one relishes reading such a rebuke, but then do we really think the Corinthians enjoyed the Apostle Paul's letters?
Note particulary the father's statement about the cowardice of fathers who try to cover up the crime rather than protecting their children. This is the reality of my pastoral experience, over and over again. Our session submits the criminal to the civil magistrate. Always. Immediately. And so must you.
Living in a university community, over many years, now, ClearNote Church has been blessed by God with a good number of opportunities to be servants of reconciliation in these tragic circumstances. We would be pleased to serve your church's officers by providing support and counsel when you need help with sexual abuse and crimes against our Lord's little ones. Please feel free to contact us.
Now, on to the account...
Tim,Thanks for the head’s up on the recent B4U-ACT symposium; unfortunately, I know more about this topic now than I ever wanted to.
Less than three weeks ago, we learned that an extended family member (whom I’ll call Michael) had molested two of my daughters. Within 36 hours of the initial discovery, he both admitted his offense and turned himself in to the police where he was arrested and indicted on two counts of rape and one gross sexual imposition; we are now in the midst of the excruciatingly slow march to a trial. As a result of this incident, I have witnessed four things in particular that I’d like to share with you.
First, as we have shared the story with friends and family, the number of women who have similar stories is simply astonishing...
Having consumed numerous articles on the topic in the last two weeks, I’ve seen numbers that say one in five women have been sexually molested. Prior to our own experience I would have dismissed this as feminist hype, but now I wonder if the number isn’t higher. Sadly, in addition to the simple destructiveness of the act itself, the vast majority of the women indicated that their families had tried to handle the problem on their own, sweeping it under the proverbial rug and never talking about it – usually because it involved a family member. As a result, there was a wellspring of resentment towards fathers over their lack of acting to protect or bring to justice these criminals – despite the fact that all of these women are married, have their own children, and lead what we all would observe to be normal lives. Fathers need to know this: avoiding the potential shame by not providing justice for your daughter is a cowardly act that will be forever remembered and would appear to cause as much resentment and psychological issues as the criminal acts themselves.
Second, while our friends, family and Church have been enormously supportive, there are so many evangelicals that simply will not draw connecting lines between pornography and deviant sexual behavior. Michael was discovered to have had a problem with pornography soon after he was married nearly 17 years ago, and his wife almost divorced him at that time. As it turned out, though he was raised in and was attending a fundamentalist (KJVers, all skirts all the time and beehives) Baptist church at the time, pornography was a systemic problem within the church (before the deluge of internet porn), where even his brother and sister-in-law were active porn users who supplied Michael with material and encouraged his wife to partake as well in order to “enhance” their marriage. (That brother was just informed by his eighteen-year-old daughter that she is a lesbian and is moving out to live with her girlfriend.) After the confrontation 16 years ago, Michael underwent evangelical-based counseling for his addiction to porn, but, as I recently discovered, at some point in the last decade, stopped going, and, we believe, returned to his addiction to material that fed his abhorrent, aberrant fantasies.
I think asserting that his addiction to porn fed his eventual attraction to pedophilia is a pretty easy connection to make, but much to my surprise several friends (evangelicals) want to insist on not drawing a straight line from porn to pedophilia. Not that I need a Venn diagram to demonstrate that pedos are a subset of the larger group “porn users”, but the immediate “whoa! That’s going too far” that my wife and I receive when we start asserting the link is remarkable – as if using heterosexual adult porn is innocuous in and of itself. When is the church going to wake up? (As an aside - Touchstone recently linked to Salvo’s description of the physical addiction that is created by porn use; if you haven’t read it, it’s very good.)
Third, the way the criminal justice system operates with regard to this crime is insane. We don’t have a death penalty for child rapists in my state, but, as the sheriff’s deputy at my house informed me, “he’ll get his when he gets to prison; they hate these kind of guys.” As if that’s comforting or, better yet, even justice. So Michael will go to prison for likely 20 years or more; his wife and her children will be forced to not only deal with his absence but also his reappearance someday, as will my family. And of course, after his 20 years of prison-style justice, he’ll likely be released as a broken, despicable creature who will have the same sexual appetite that put him in prison in the first place, and the odds are good that he’ll act out the desires on someone else’s children. So where’s the justice in this system? At least with execution we could all move on, and he could throw himself upon the mercy of God. As it is, we kick this most miserable can down the road, never quite losing the dread of what may come years from now. Strangely, several of my evangelical friends have engaged in a horrible schadenfreude with regard to the treatment he’ll receive in prison – treatment which I consider to be no different than torture for the next 20 years. How is it that our society – evangelicals included - regards frequent prison rapes as an acceptable form of justice?
Finally, the way the two evangelical churches involved (neither of them my own) have handled this event once they were notified has been perfectly abysmal. It’s evident that churches are not addressing sexual sin in any kind of regular or thorough fashion; both pastors were caught completely flat-footed and offered horrible advice and little to no wisdom. To one’s credit, he’s gotten himself – with the help of some of his elders – up to speed quickly and is now making amends for his initial mistakes. But again, the whole episode demonstrates that we, the Church, have become an ostrich people and we are being destroyed because of it.
I write this not to vent (or at least not primarily), dear brother, but simply as a way to say “keep pressing on.” Your efforts must continue until the church wakes up to the absolute tragedy that we’ve enabled and participated in with regard to unmooring ourselves from biblical sexual standards.
Pray for us and blessings on your work.
(TB)




Comments
This post and the related earlier one are so helpful. They describe our present and our future. "Such" were some of us.
This post actually brings together a couple of issues that this blog site tries to expose.
As you look at expecting men providing justice for their daughters/children there is an inherent assumption in that statement. The assumption is that the men will act like men. Over and over again in this blog site it has been pointed out that the church has been feminized. Even in Jody Killingsworth’s recent excellent answer to an e-mail in a post on masculine worship he makes the point that “Women (quite naturally) and effeminate men (quite unnaturally) take delight in relationships more than truth…. Godly men, however, delight first in objective principles that are bigger than and outside themselves. Scripture is full of such principles: truth, order, dominion, honor, self-sacrifice, judgment, law, fatherhood, citizenship, duty, truth, war, etc.”
Men who will not stand up for justice in these situations prize relationships more than truth. They worry about hurt feelings, theirs or others. Yes they are cowards as the e-mail author pointed out. And many of our churches are filled with such men and our sessions are no exception.
“You don’t mess with family.” This came from the mouth of our one time pastor when we tried to enlist him to get believing family members to help deal with pornography and fornication that was running wild in a single parent family in our church. A family’s right to NOT be obligated to deal with the scandalous sins of their adult children is the LAW that has been pushed on us. And the church most often runs from her responsibilities too.
“Fornication is no big deal!” That from the mouth of our former TE, several RE’s and their wives. So porn must be no deal at all right?
Which brings me to another point made on this blog site from time to time: the slathering of cheap grace on the people to the exclusion of any meaningful talk of sin. Recently in the blogosphere there has been much talk of the indicatives verses the imperatives in preaching. It is a fine,heady academic discussion (there are places and times for these) but please gentlemen get out of your easy chairs, put the books down, and go out to shepherd and you will find the answer to this “discussion” there in the manure piles of the lives of your congregations; yes, even in the churches in the fancy towns with upper middle class folks who exude “perfection”. Sin is no respecter of socio-economic status. How can one expect to exercise loving church discipline apart from including imperatives in the preaching of the Word?
I wonder if anyone has read Hebrews 6 where it talks about moving on to maturity in Christ by going beyond the elementary doctrines of salvation?
The account in this post should come as no surprise given our penchant for cheap grace and so many men who do not know how to be men anymore. Unfortunately the author of the e-mail is correct in his assessment of the church: “… the whole episode demonstrates that we, the Church, have become an ostrich people and we are being destroyed because of it.”
Ostriches: I’ve seen an elder who knew pornography was in the home of a church member and his solution to addressing the problem was to not let his son stay overnight in that home. Or another elder who knew that his nephew was spending most nights sleeping at his girl friend’s. And the elder/uncle’s take on that? “It is not my concern.” The stories could go on and on.
This stuff is real. The legacy we are leaving to our children, as well as the light we shine to a lost and dying world…, they reek.
We need to be doing what is right and praying for revival.
Thank you for posts like this that keep it in front of us and will not let us run from it.
May God be merciful and bring us to repentance.
All this has been going on for a very long time (in terms of human life-span).
Thirty-three years ago, I landed in my first solo pastorate after a one-year internship that should have warned me of things to come (a different sordid story). My new flock, as it turned out, had had had one divorce each year of its 13-year life at the time I arrived. This rate continued during the four years of my increasingly stormy pastorate.
The problem? Yes, there were the divorces. But what kept gasoline drizzling on the fire was the perpetual failure of the previous pastor and his elders to lift a single finger to resist even one of these divorces.
I tried to turn the tide, foolishly thinking that teaching the Word of God would avail. It was very much like sowing seed on gravel. Of the six elders, I could only persuade two to accompany me to call on a father openly consorting with a woman not his wife, or another man who had been secretely beating his wife (until she filed for divorce, hardened against ever contemplating reconcilation), or another elder (!) who had given his wife an STD because of his fling with a prostitute. The climax of this soap-operish pastorate was when a divorced mother announced her engagement to her high school sweet-heart, a Baptist pastor whose divorce from his wife would not be final for another six months.
Discipline for anyone was out of the question. No one wanted to get involved. Messy, messy, messy. And, what of the ultimate consequences? Excommunication? What's that? Some sort of Popish self-righteousness? We believe in grace!!
So, with a brand new baby on board and a marriage less than two-years old, I was fired. And, what I quickly learned via interviews for a few open positions my seminary's placement service arranged was this: no church wanted to give the time of day to an applicant with that particular history in his previous church employment. One pastor who interviewed me, after hearing me recite the main points of the long controversy and telling me candidly that I would not be welcome in his church ministry, offered me this advice: "Don't drive down any one-way streets."
As horrific as the tales shared by Pr. Bayly and others here recently, I am not at all surprised. When there is a climate, a "culture" if you will, in which sheep may count on their elders and pastors to turn their gaze away from nasty messes festering in the families under their charge, you will find exactly this kind of thing surfacing -- not just the divorces, but the sordid abuses of children that go undetected because no one wants to see them.
#3
I don't know if this is a fair comparison or example, but here goes. What the shakeout in the Catholic Church in Ireland over the last few years has made clear, is that the patterns of sexual and other abuse of children there, went back decades. It has now got to the point that the Prime Minister of Ireland, himself from the deeply conservative west of the country, has taken the church to task for the cover-ups and worse, and for the church not doing anything once they clearly knew they had a problem - so much so that the church's moral authority is now severely damaged.
Why mention this? Because we do not want to be next. The pastor of the church I grew up in was later discovered to have been sexually abusing vulnerable young men in his care. The church's response was to lever him out of the ministry once the evidence was unavoidable, but they could have acted much sooner than they did, and their support for the victims was very poor.
On a related note, the rot generally starts well before sexual sin of this magnitude is involved. The generally-interesting Lee Grady reflects in this post on the life and death of one megachurch pastor and the unwillingness of his church to tackle him on his sin:
http://www.charismamag.com/index.php/fire-in-my-bones/31798-what-we-must-learn-from-the-zachery-tims-tragedy
Thank God for His faithful shepherds.
I was told by a good friend "you always see the worst in everyone" and I thought "I always see the worst in myself" ... And try to blind myself to it.
Is this projection or a desire to free others as we've been freed?
(And to protect others as we were or were not.)
These are cases where erring on the side of action is the most prudent course. And tho most loving to all involved.
Add new comment