Not to worry, Congresswoman Bachmann's resigned membership in her WELS church...
The Wisconisn Evangelical Lutheran Synod sees the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod and raises them one. Or maybe ten.
In my former home of Pardeeville, Wisconsin, the WELS congregation was the dominant religious presence in town. When they called a new pastor, Mary Lee and I decided to invite him with his wife and children over for dinner. After a cordial introduction, we sat down at the table and I turned to him and said, "I've heard lots of things through the years, but let me ask you directly: do you pray, do I pray, or do we not pray at all?"
He answered, "You go ahead and pray and we'll sit by," and immediately his good wife turned to their children and said, "We're going to pray; fold your hands and close your eyes." God bless her.
We had a pleasant evening. During the conversation the WELS pastor told us his grandmothers was a godly Baptist and that he didn't pray with her, either...
He explained that WELS souls were concerned to avoid a "mixed confession."After that evening together in our home, we never saw him again. In a town of 1,500 where I helped lead a youth group shared by eleven different churches, the black hole of WELS confessionalism swallowed him whole. And in my almost-nine years of work in that town I never saw any act nor heard any prayer nor read anything that demonstrated WELS men or the souls under their care have any evangelical commitment. By all appearances the church produced cceremonial religion--which is to say, sacramentalists.
One episode stands out. I was working in my office one day and heard a knock on the office door--we kept the church unlocked. Opening the door, I found two junior high school boys standing there. After greeting them I invited them in for a visit. They said they were on a mission from school to find some working stiff and ask him about his job, and they'd chosen me. They had a few questions about what I did with my time and then we turned to religion. I asked them if they went to church and they both said they did now because they were in confirmation class and you had to go to church while you were in confirmation class. Their church was the local WELS congregation.
Then one boy turned to the other and announced with some high anticipation, "My dad says as soon as confirmation is over, I can stop going."
That did an excellent job of summing up the WELS version of Christian faith I observed there in Wisconsin. It appeard to be a ghetto of pure sacramentalism with no observable impact for Christ anywhere or any time. My brother David has an even worse experience of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod while attending one of their schools for several years in Elgin, Illinois. I'd sum up our convictions by stating that we've both read Luther's commentary on Galatians several times and can't see the resemblance between Luther's commitment to Scripture and Evangelical faith and what we've observed from the Lutherans we've known, whether WELS or LCMS.
So it appears the WELS version of Christian religion poses no particular threat to our idolatrous state, right?
Which brings us around to a news item today from the Atlantic concerning presidential candidate Michele Bachmann's membership in a Minnesota WELS congregation. Or I should say her recently-resigned membership in a WELS congregation--Congresswoman Bachmann sent a letter requesting formal disassociation this past year.
Breathlessly the Atlantic announces, "Michele Bachmann's Church Says the Pope is the Antichrist." The headline is deceptive since the article later reports Governor Bachmann renounced her membership while preparing to run for President this past year. Yet sure enough, still at this late and decadent age when Reformed men of impeccable credentials are all buddy-buddy with the Vatican, the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Church continues to pronounce what Luther and Calvin and the Westminster divines were all certain of--that the Pope is the ant-Christ.
The Atlantic connects Congresswoman Bachmann's association with this WELS doctrine to President Obama's association with his United Church of Christ pastor, Jeremiah Wright, and John McCain's relationship with the Rev. John Hagee. Their point is that each of these associations are shameful and must be repudiated by anyone seeking public office in this modern, wise and sensitive world.
Banging on this drum for the umpteenth time, the privatizing of religion is the very opposite of what our Lord commanded in His Great Commission:
And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age." (Matthew 28:18-20)
All what?
When men try to justify their silence in the public square by claiming it's not shame or cowardice but high-minded principle, it's clear the intent of their arguments is to deny that our Lord has any authority outside the home and the Church, and that they wish to make it clear to the world that no one should fear us because we are committed to being no threat to their bloodthirsty kingdoms. Our religion is private and heavenly--not public or earthy.
What men who want their religion safe in the church-house on Lord's Day morning with no mention of the civil magistrate or laws or politics are accomplishing is the destruction of true Christian faith. It's impossible for Evangelical Christians to agree to stay on the reservation and keep their mouths shut without denying a whole bunch of commands and exhortations of Scripture--not to mention examples of godly witness given by our Lord and His deacons and apostles.
He is the One who warned us, "For what is a man profited if he gains the whole world, and loses or forfeits himself? For whoever is ashamed of Me and My words, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when He comes in His glory, and the glory of the Father and of the holy angels" (Luke 9:25, 26).
Even if every Reformed pastor and elder and their sons made a contract with our civil magistrates and their chattering class enforcers to work for the repeal of every single law that reflects the Perfections of our Heavenly Father--His justice and truth and the sanctity of life that bears His Image, for instance--it would not be enough.
Having denied our Lord's authority over this whole world, we would have announced to every man watching that we are ashamed of our Lord and His Gospel. Trot out our high-minded theological justifications as much as we wanted, they'd get the message very well, thank you. And seeing our flinching, they'd come in for the kill.
Which is precisely what is happening across the Western world today. They told us we could have our religion in private. We agreed and declared our religion to be a private affair, only.
Now they're making sure we're never alone.
Thanks to the fear and shame of Christian pastors and elders who announce to our wicked civil magistrates that Christians pose no threat to his bloody regime, every last man gifted by the Holy Spirit for secular authority understands he must avoid membership in any Biblical congregation.
Most everything faithful pastors proclaim as they preach the Gospel is absolutely scandalous to the wicked and will be used to banish those listening to rural shtetls where they'll be perfectly free to baptize their own sons into the name of their own private and impotent god.
Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League, responded to Congresswoman Bachmann's former membership in a WELS church, saying, "Clearly, that is anti-Catholic. This kind of hatred is reminiscent of Bob Jones. I believe [Bachmann] has in the past condemned anti-Catholicism. But there's no question -- all you have to do is read it -- that they clearly have anti-Catholic statements up there... (I)t's clear that the (WELS) teachings are noxious and it's important for her to speak to the issue. Obama had to answer for Wright, McCain had to answer for the Rev. John Hagee, and this is something that Bachmann has to answer for."
Stop and consider all the noxious things men ashamed of Jesus Christ hide, today.
Spare the rod and spoil the child. The effeminate will not inherit the Kingdom of God. Christless Jewish houses of worship are synagogues of Satan. The woman who divorces her husband and marries another is an adulteress. Murderers must be executed. No man can serve both God and mammon. Elders hand men over to Satan. Those who eat and drink at the Lord's Table without discerning the precious Body and Blood of our Lord get sick and die. God made the world in six days. We are to be fruitful and multiply.
Then there's that bit about obeying God rather than man.




Comments
The post has a lot of interesting material, so it may be useful to condense it to two excerpts:
"Then one boy turned to the other and announced with some high anticipation, "My dad says as soon as confirmation is over, I can stop going."...
... I should say her recently-resigned membership in a WELS congregation--Congresswoman Bachmann sent a letter requesting formal disassociation this past year."
In both cases, a little inconvenience sent the person out of the church. In Mrs. Bachmann's case, it didn't even work, and she should have known it wouldn't. The Atlantic article seems very fair, and gave her office the chance to respond, which it didn't. It says the issue of the Pope as anti-christ came up in a debate she was in once and she didn't know her own church's position. She could have resigned in protest at discovering the position, or she could have kept membership and said she disagreed on that one point. Instead, she tried to sneak away. Does she go to church now? (or for the past two years?)
"Bachmann had listed her membership in the church on her campaign site for congress in 2006. She lists no church affiliation on her campaign website or her official congressional website....Becky Rogness, a spokesperson in Bachmann’s congressional office, said the Congresswoman now attends a nondenominational church in the Stillwater area but did not know the name of the church or how long she had been attending. "http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/15/michele-bachmann-officially-lea...
Here's a quote from another blog:
"So when Michele Bachmann sat down last week with David Brody, White House correspondent for the Christian Broadcasting Network, to talk about faith and politics, did he ask her where she goes to church? Nope:
'Let me just start with a topic that is near and dear to your heart, and that is prayer. Just simply about your prayer life. What has your prayer life been like recently? What do you pray about'...
"While Bachmann has a particular reason to fuzz up her religious identity, she's hardly the only latter-day Republican politician to do so. Sarah Palin steadfastly refused to acknowledge her own lifelong (until she ran for statewide office) membership in the Assemblies of God. Other examples abound. I've got an idea that there's a memo out there to GOP candidates that they should just present themselves as "Christians." That's what white evangelicals increasingly prefer to call themselves, and it lets you evade all invidious denominational--and doctrinal--distinctions. Or even better, just talk about your recent prayer life."
http://www.spiritual-politics.org/2011/07/what_church_does_bachmann_attend.html
Hmmmm,
With respect for and agreement with the point I think you're seeking to make, this is nonetheless a very odd approach to the problem. Of course the chattering class and power elites demand that religious leaders bow to their secular molech - and some Christians happily go along with this evil - but its not altogether clear that this is what motivated Bachmann's move (perhaps, like you, she was unimpressed by apparently rampant sacramentalism and preferred a more evangelical church). It further saddens me that the testimony of the LCMS you both encountered was less than you'd have hoped to find. My experience of the LCA (now ELCA), and the LCMS (to which my parents transferred in my late teens) was very different from yours, however. While never meeting a WELS pastor or congregant, I found in both LCMS and LCA congregations godly, humble, evangelical, Christ-honoring people and faithful, Bible preaching ministers. I also found distressing signs of theological liberalism (we all know what's become of ELCA), and people who were, while members, only rarely to be seen in Church. Thankfully, this isn't a problem that affects the Presbyterian world, right? Sure.
In short, I think you could have painted a portrait of the problem without using such a big brush. The secularists - and their lapdogs in the bullied pulpits - will go on whining about the fearful specter of raging fundamentalism and hate speech. Well, the back yard dogs may bark, but the train need not stop. Since the whole world and every realm and authority is under God and his King, the judges and civic rulers should do homage to the Son lest he become angry and they bring his wrath upon themselves. And yes, we should preach the whole counsel of God, and let the chips fall where they may - light a candle that will never be put out (eg Latimer and Ridley), etc.
Yet it may be that we have co-belligerents in this cause in places some may find surprising. Imagine it - faithful Lutherans, Anglicans, Baptists, some members of the Bill Donahoe's group, and even Presbyterians and Reformed - all coming out of the closet for the King and his authority (admittedly, our Roman Catholic friends will seek to make the case on the basis of natural law, but that's a subpoint if we're all being shot by the same firing squad).
In an odd and ironic twist which shows how far the culture has decayed, all the Atlantic is doing is 'outing' the candidate - but doing so, as you note, poorly and inaccurately. "The times, they are a' changin."
By the way, it is Representative Bachmann, not 'Governor' Bachmann, as you refer to her in paragraph 11 or so.
Again, appreciate the point being made, but it need not be made at the expense of potential allies. You may not have met them, but I sure have. Lets also find out where Bachmann ended up; hey, maybe its the Hip Deep in Glory Worship Center where everyone is pretty serious about kingdom and public square issues. I'll only worry if its a university campus Methodist group. Oh, but there's my big brush!
This has not been my experience at all with either Synod and I'm a life-long LCMS-er and my parents, formerly LCMS, are WELS. All the WELS pastors I've met are wonderful, caring people with a heart for the Lord and bringing people to Him. The WELS church members are a lot like those of many other churches, a mixed bag of sinful but saved people.
I'm not Lutheran but in my experience the problems with LCMS you describe are more the exception than the rule. WELS I have little experience with but at least, at first glance, they don't seem overconcerned about conforming to a godless societies wishes. One can't help but like that.
Everything else was great.
Also according to local news in Minnesota she's been attending a different church for two years but didn't formally terminate her membership with WELS until her pastor asked her to clarify her status as she'd not been attending. I was surprised to hear she'd been a WELS member as she'd always sounded more Baptist to me.
Meaning everything else in the post was great.
One interesting thought I have here is that apparently she's left, among other reasons, because the lutheran confessions call the pope the antichrist--something Westminster does as well. Is it your impression that the confessions call the Pope "THE" antichrist, or "a", as it seems that there are certain characteristics of the antichrist that the popes have not had.
Thoughts?
I had a somewhat similar experience with WELS in my first pastorate in NE Wisconsin. The pastor--about a year or so older than I (but I was only 23)--was very formal: "Hello, I am Pastor X." He was not uncharitable. If he came along in his car and found me walking, he would offer me a ride--as long as it was at night and nobody was around to see us.
But years, later, in Massachusetts, I worshiped for a while in a WELS church that was, I thought, genuinely evangelistic. We found a different church because we could not agree with the Lutherans about the sacraments, but I respected their forthrightness and their refusal to softpedal what they believed was truth given to them.
Add new comment