The Declaration of Independence...

Some years ago I was reading the Times on the Fourth of July and noticed they'd reproduced a full-page copy of the Declaration of Independence. So I read it and couldn't stop thinking of the terrible oppression we tolerate and live under now as good, submissive citizens while patting ourselves on the back for ending "taxation without representation" and that pecualiar institution of slavery. Between a quarter and a third of our nation's unborn children have their blood shed by wicked men, today; our government approves of this bloodshed; and we Christians are at ease in Zion.

Read the Declaration of Independence and compare the oppression then with the government we have today. Men are not what they used to be. And I'm not just referring to that small group of Reformed men who have made a principle of having their religion an entirely private affair.

May God have mercy on us. (TB)

* * *

THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them...

a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

    For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

    For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they     should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

    For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

    For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

    For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

    For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

    For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing     therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once     an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these     Colonies:

    For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering     fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

    For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to     legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.


The 56 signatures on the Declaration appear in the positions indicated:

Column 1
Georgia:
   Button Gwinnett
   Lyman Hall
   George Walton

Column 2
North Carolina:
   William Hooper
   Joseph Hewes
   John Penn
South Carolina:
   Edward Rutledge
   Thomas Heyward, Jr.
   Thomas Lynch, Jr.
   Arthur Middleton

Column 3
Massachusetts:
John Hancock
Maryland:
Samuel Chase
William Paca
Thomas Stone
Charles Carroll of Carrollton
Virginia:
George Wythe
Richard Henry Lee
Thomas Jefferson
Benjamin Harrison
Thomas Nelson, Jr.
Francis Lightfoot Lee
Carter Braxton

Column 4
Pennsylvania:
   Robert Morris
   Benjamin Rush
   Benjamin Franklin
   John Morton
   George Clymer
   James Smith
   George Taylor
   James Wilson
   George Ross
Delaware:
   Caesar Rodney
   George Read
   Thomas McKean

Column 5
New York:
   William Floyd
   Philip Livingston
   Francis Lewis
   Lewis Morris
New Jersey:
   Richard Stockton
   John Witherspoon
   Francis Hopkinson
   John Hart
   Abraham Clark

Column 6
New Hampshire:
   Josiah Bartlett
   William Whipple
Massachusetts:
   Samuel Adams
   John Adams
   Robert Treat Paine
   Elbridge Gerry
Rhode Island:
   Stephen Hopkins
   William Ellery
Connecticut:
   Roger Sherman
   Samuel Huntington
   William Williams
   Oliver Wolcott
New Hampshire:
   Matthew Thornton

Comments

"He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people."

Sounds an awful lot like what Obama's judge did to Indiana's new legislation that removed funding from Planned Parenthood. Indiana's corporate will was passed, only for a judge to decide that we don't actually know what's best for us. Thank you Tanya Walton-Pratt, for opposing the will of the people.

It is my hope and prayer that our legislators will continue with "manly firmness" in getting this judge's decision overturned.

"Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness...That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it...when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government..."

or

"Submit yourselves for the Lord's sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority, or to governors as sent by him for the punishment of evildoers and the praise of those who do right... Servants, be submissive to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and gentle, but also to those who are unreasonable. For this finds favor, if for the sake of conscience toward God a person bears up under sorrows when suffering unjustly. For what credit is there if, when you sin and are harshly treated, you endure it with patience? But if when you do what is right and suffer for it you patiently endure it, this finds favor with God. For you have been called for this purpose, since Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example for you to follow in His steps..."
- 1 Peter 2:13-14, 18-21 NASB

Brothers, these two are not the same path. The Declaration of Independence is an explanation of why rebellion is necessary, but it reads the opposite of the Scriptures that deal with the exact same topic: how to behave when your ruler is unjust.

Thomas Paine's Common Sense is similarly a treatise on why of course we submit to our rulers as long as they are reasonable -- and no longer. Our founding fathers taught us that rebellion is our duty. And are we not now a nation of rebels, even in the church?

Surely for those of us who love the Word of God and follow our Lord and Master Jesus Christ, the Declaration of Independence cannot be our guide.

I hope everyone had a happy Secession Day yesterday. :)

>>He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

I found this grievance particularly germane. I love how Jefferson likens bureaucracy to a plague of locusts.

>>Brothers, these two are not the same path. The Declaration of Independence is an explanation of why rebellion is necessary, but it reads the opposite of the Scriptures that deal with the exact same topic: how to behave when your ruler is unjust.

Dear Daniel,

Two things. First, if a brother in Christ celebrates the Fourth of July with any content, historically, he's celebrating the putting off of financial oppression. Some believe the revolt was wrong, Biblically. My point is not to engage that question which, again historically, is moot. Rather, to those who honor it, I wish to point out the relative insignificance of the oppression they believe justified the revolt and compare that oppression to that of the non-federal government inside the Beltway today. I myself reserve judgment concerning that revolt. I wasn't there and haven't studied the leadership given it by many believers, including godly Presbyterians.

But second, concerning our own government today, our masters are not those men temporarily holding the authority of the judicial, legislative, and executive branches, but we the people under our Constitution. We have delegated authority to them, they have sworn allegiance to the authority of the Constitution, and it is our duty to hold them to their oaths--to force them to submit to the civil authority over them. Thus we can withdraw their delegated authority any time we see it necessary in order to protect our constitution and representational democracy. We may impeach our civil servants from any of the three branches, and to do so is not a violation of Scripture's commands to obey our civil magistrates.

As a matter of fact, a good case can be made that the refusal to impeach--for instance the federal judge (Ms. Walton-Pratt) who rebelled against the Constitution on several critical points by throwing out the new Indiana law protecting our unborn citizens from slaughter--is not our submission to authority at all, but rather our own conniving at rebellion. We have a judge who is duty-bound to submit to our constitutional authority and she rebels against it under the guise of submitting to it. It's naked rebellion and usurpation of proper authority, and Christians sit by assuring themselves that to remain silent in the face of this bloody rebellion is faithfulness to Scripture.

And it's babies being slaughtered.

We own the authority and we connive at rebellion against it.

Love,

I don't think the rightness or wrongness of the Revolution can be moot as long as we use its assumed righteousness to justify decisions today. But you're saying that's exactly *not* what we're doing, aren't you?

Our forefathers, who had no legal appeal from the decisions of their king, revolted against him for a list of debatable reasons including personal suffering and discomfort and finances.

But in our day we are at ease in Zion in the face of clearly abominable *murders* of the most defenseless, and this at a time when we need not revolt but only exercise the authority that we already possess under our current government!

Warmly,

Dear Daniel,

Yes, you got what I'm trying to say.

Love,

Where was this in my education, or my upbringing, or in the pulpit, or in my personal study? How is it that only now I begin to even understand an issue of such import, let alone act with understanding?

It is time to rebuild the foundation. I need to make up for lost time.

These men really knew how to use words. The declaration just sweats FAITHFULNESS. I'm so thankful for them.

Add new comment