A review of Voyage of the Dawn Treader...

(Tim) Here's a teaser from this movie review:

The Voyage of the Dawn Treader joins a pantheon of other films in which the redemption motif is found within ourselves. Within such a schema, man is placed at the centre and God – in this case Aslan – becomes an irrelevant fixture. The Aslan of the recent movie is little more than a motivator, certainly not the savior he is within Lewis’s series.

In Lewis’s book, Aslan is terrifying...

When Lucy is tempted to vanity, her sin is overcome by fear of Aslan’s wrath and Lewis doesn’t hesitate to say that Lucy “became horribly afraid”. By contrast, Hollywood’s Aslan helps Lucy to find the source of strength within herself.

Or again, in the book, the salvation of Eustace from a dragon back into a human occurs through an excruciating application of Aslan’s claws – an experience that Eustace described as hurting more than anything in his entire life. By contrast, Hollywood’s Aslan is too tame to even touch Eustace. He does not strike fear into sinners nor does he use suffering to restore them to health. Though Eustace does apparently repent, it happens after being pumped up with motivational psychology from Reepicheep about being an extraordinary person.

 

Tags: 

Comments

Ugh. I remember seeing the first promotional poster for "The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe" and noting about five or six significant discrepancies between the promotional poster and the book. It is as if there is no book, no matter how great, that Hollyweird doesn't think they can "improve on."

Kinda like the dying Hebrew slave in "The 10 Commandments" quoting Paul....obviously rewriting the greats is not a new phenomenon in Hollyweird.

Good things to discuss at the dinner table with the kids and help them develop discerning minds. Were there no spiritual truths to be mined here?

I haven't seen the movie. But I have read Plugged In Online's review and it's different from yours. I came away from theirs with the impression that there were some spiritual truths, though they changed the story. I never EVER expect Hollywood to get it all right. Do you? But all truth is God's truth.

One of my all-time favorite Narnia moments is in this book where Lucy is desperate (near the island where dreams come true and they're close to getting sucked in to the black fog surrounding the island) and she cries out, "Oh Aslan, if you love us, help us now." And a dove brushes past (or some bird) and it's Aslan and he whispers to her, "dear heart." It moves me to tears to think of the God of the Universe calling me dear heart.

(my other favorite is in the last book where the king turns in battle and sees his heart's greatest desire... Aslan)

"But all truth is God's truth."

Well, God's truth is all truth. If we say it the other way around, it sounds like our subjective perceptions of truth determine the character of God.

One of the unfortunate aspects of the movie, Ruth, is that it presents a very different Aslan than Lewis does in his books. It's a tame, soft Aslan with hardly any of the fearful power of the Lion in Lewis' Narnia. The Aslan in the movie is not the Aslan who terrifies Lucy in her sin, and who painfully scrapes off Eustace's dragon scales. It's not the Aslan you so love from reading the Chronicles of Narnia. The cinematic Aslan might say "dear heart," but there's no reason to cry because he is not a picture of the omnipotent, holy God of the Universe, the Lion of the tribe of Judah.

There were some spiritual truths in the movie, to be sure. However, I felt the main point of the posted review was to highlight the director's failure to capture the depth of Lewis' intent. Primarily, this involved a perversion of the theme of irresistible grace throughout The Chronicles of Narnia into a gospel of self-actualization and self-esteem.

Add new comment