You are here
Home ›Blokey blokes and church music...
by David and Tim Bayly on July 22, 2010 - 10:02am
(Tim, w/thanks to Brian A.) Here's a clip of a Matt Redman interview where he addresses men and the music of worship. Good stuff. Note his comment about the church being over-mothered and under-fathered...
Related Posts
Clearnote Churches
Clearnote Fellowship
Christ the Word
Monthly archive
- May 2013 (21)
- April 2013 (33)
- March 2013 (43)
- February 2013 (28)
- January 2013 (41)
- December 2012 (31)
- November 2012 (37)
- October 2012 (38)
- September 2012 (21)
- August 2012 (28)
- July 2012 (46)
- June 2012 (50)
Popular Posts
Tags
Abortion euthanasia... (584)
Feminism (584)
Politics (366)
Reformed world (322)
PCA (302)
Evangelicalism (294)
Homosexuality (294)
Misc. (270)
Throw the radio in the bathtub (258)
Academia (256)
Reformed theology (234)
Culture (227)
Children are a blessing (218)
Emergent church (208)
R2K (Radical Two Kingdom) (196)
Recent Comments
-
why men pull away catch him and keep him
on Athanasius College: an alternative to old schools' hyperinflated tuition...
7 min 32 sec ago
-
Roger Keane
on Why is there no ADHD in France...
2 hours 26 min ago
-
Denver Todd
on Some pics for your enjoyment...
7 hours 8 min ago
-
Denver Todd
on Why move to Bloomington?
7 hours 12 min ago
-
Alex Costa
on Some pics for your enjoyment...
7 hours 15 min ago




Comments
Ninety-five percent of modern-day Christian-labeled music I’ve listened to is really disconcerting.
There are too many romantic love songs with God’s name peppered throughout. Most of them demonstrate a lack of reverence for Who He is (“Big House” by the Newsboys, for instance), and exhibit an obvious lack of creativity or craftsmanship. They remain either empty gift boxes with “the thought that counts” or unfurnished rooms with one shade of drywall.
Some, as you may well be aware, require the repeating of a chorus of five words fifty times. The Apostle Paul once said he would rather speak five intelligible words than 10,000 in tongues. I think the same principle can be applied to worship music. Why, when we have the potential to worship Him with perhaps three-hundred words (as in the Hymns), do we limit ourselves to the same five? Those five become trite and mantra-like.
And the fact that modern Christian artists sell these things…which are essentially, what I deem “patented prayers” is beyond wrong.
Christian music is falling prey to utilizing business tactics to draw a crowd and gain profits; it is essentially conforming to the world and settling for mediocrity.
Maybe what we need to do is set the psalms to heavy metal music. Power chords are very masculine, especially when blasted out of a Marshall stack at 110 decibels.
On the other hand, the congregation could not hear themselves sing, but they could still mosh and head-bang to God.
[I'm joking.]
Why not chant the psalms the way God's people did?
>Why not chant the psalms the way God's people did?
Because the martyrs of the Reformation were insufficiently masculine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoF1eAIdy1Q&feature=related
I'm a big fan of this kind of singing myself. Also, I think the guy make some GREAT points. My mom- who is not a particularly "masculine" lady- snidely refers to certain songs (usually modern but by no means exclusively so!) as "Jesus is my boyfriend" songs. The women don't want watered-down worship either, praise God.
I don't know if the word "bloke" is used in American English, but if you haven't come across it, it's British for "regular guy". Which, curiously, is what Matt's accent sounds like, which makes me wonder how on earth he could write one of the songs he did. Because he can and has done a lot better.
But I digress. I have challenged my own pastor, more than once, about songs of the Jesus-is-my-boyfriend variety, and will no doubt continue to do so. At the moment, though, I'm listening to one modern worship song:
I was born
I was born to sing for you
I didn't have a choice but to lift you up
And sing whatever song you wanted me to
I give you back my voice
From the womb my first cry, it was a joyful noise ...
Justified until we die
You and I will magnify
The Magnificent, oh the Magnificent
Now, does anyone know where it's from? ;-)
Ross, isn't that song by U2?
Very interesting change of heart by Matt Redman, certainly makes me interested to hear what changes to expect for his next album (hope that wasn't his only intent), and how it might change the face of CCM. Between how widespread his music is, and his contacts within CCM (via touring, etc). All that from a human-perspective, of course. Sounds positive.
...and, because I can't stop thinking about masculinity and music, I thought y'all might appreciate this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-_rf2jVxxY&feature=player_embedded
Ezra 3:13 "...the people shouted with a loud shout, and the sound was heard far away."
1Samuel 4:5 "As the ark of the covenant of the LORD came into the camp, all Israel shouted with a great shout, so that the earth resounded."
1Kings 1:40 "All the people went up after him, and the people were playing on flutes and rejoicing with great joy, so that the earth shook at their noise."
Kevin, I'm convinced from Scripture that the worship of God's ancient people Israel bore far more resemblance to the vociferousness of these fine "blokes" then to the principled politeness of white-collar Reformed congregations today.
Thank you for posting the link.
I really don't think you understand traditional Reformed worship if you view it as "principled politeness" coming from the "white-collar" class.
So are you white collar? Blue collar? I've split about seven cord of wood by hand to prepare for next winter. What kind of collar does that earn me?
3 higher education degrees.
Classically trained violinist.
Harvey Fellow.
Well traveled.
Well read by today's standards.
I'll be white collar till the day I die no matter how much wood I split.
The choice doesn't have to be between being exclusively middle class (white collar), and being middle class, but trying somehow to attract the lower class (blue collar).
Here's a spin-off from "Go for the men and the women will follow": "Be zealous for the upper class and the middle and lower classes will follow." The church did that in the ancient world--and it reached every level. But that strategy demands a broader missional outlook than most of us Reformed have. It also demands an acceptance that it's okay if some of us focus on different classes.
Where in the world does this peculiar obsession with "social class" come from?
I drive a forklift and work on a dock and have a couple higher-ed degrees. Does that make me some kind of white/blue collar hybrid? Do I need my own worship service?
Baylys, while some are here looking for a fight, several have asked good questions about your views on worship. I keep waiting for a post in response. Sometimes it seems you two expect everyone to just "get" what you are saying, but it's clear that many of your readers (including some of your most supportive) don't see it as plainly as you do. So . . .
How about some explanations for how style (why "vulgar"?), class (why the blue collar?), and sex (why will women follow?) play a role in decisions about worship music, and why these ideas rise above the importance of mere preference. I'm sure you have your reasons, but we can't all see them from where we're sitting. Inform us.
Dear Matt,
I am afraid you have made an error in calling for a response from Pastors Tim and David on this issue. You assume the argument over worship in the church or the way class affects that worship is a new one to this blog. They have addressed these issues several times by now and calling them to answer is calling them to repost past work.
Ben Curell
You are correct that I haven't read every post about worship. And if the Baylys would prefer readers here to read all previous posts to understand what they say, then hey, it's their blog. But it's not an error to ask for clarification, particularly when several others keep asking the same questions.
Since you mentioned, Ben could you refer me to a few posts, or should I just read all of them?
Dear Matt,
For starters, I would direct you to the following posts:
First, this post contains probably the most extended, instructive discussion and interaction of any such post I've seen:
http://www.baylyblog.com/2009/06/worship-and-music-you-dont-want-to-miss-this.html
Second, this post on some principles of the Good Shepherd Band: http://www.baylyblog.com/2008/08/church-of-the-g.html
And finally, this series of posts on music and musical style in worship (though note, not written by Tim or David):
http://www.baylyblog.com/2005/12/thoughts_on_mus.html
http://www.baylyblog.com/2005/12/thoughts_on_mus_1.html
http://www.baylyblog.com/2005/12/thoughts_on_mus_2.html
There are others, but I'd start there.
Warmly,
Josh
Thanks Josh! I've been away from internet access for a few days, but I'll catch up on these this week.
Add new comment