Personal criticism obligates commenters to identify themselves...

(Tim) David and I have often said we do not think anonymity is good, particularly on the Internet. We don't require registration before posting comments, nor do we moderate them, but we do require comments that are critical and get pointed and personal to be signed with a real first and last name. Our enforcement of this is spotty, but sooner or later we get around to it.

This weekend, we lost a longtime Baylyblog commenter because of this policy. After this commenter had engaged in many personal exchanges with Darryl Hart, and several individuals had requested that this commenter identify himself, we wrote him privately asking ourselves that he identify himself. The commenter declined. We're sorry to lose him from the discussion, but it should be noted Darryl Hart has identified himself from the very beginning. We are grateful and respect him for it.

In time, we're hopeful our veteran commenter will be back. But if he comes, he'll have to come bearing gifts of his first and last name. Until then, we'll all (everyone but Darryl, that is) miss him.

Tags: 

Comments

I may be the only commenter to which this applies, but I ask publically in case there are others.

I routinely sign in as "Fr. Bill." Admitted, this is not a first and last name.

On the other hand, anyone who does ~not~ know who I am, can easily find out by:

1. Pr. Bayly's references time to time to my last name;

2. Clicking on the link on my moniker that takes one to my own blog (dormant since a spell of debilitating health last year), which provides more biographical information than any ordinary person would wish; and,

3. Googling "Fr. Bill" which is the moniker by which I post on other blogs and which, therefore, allows those who know me from those blogs to recognize me quickly here.

In this connection, I don't recall anyone ever complaining that they had no idea who I am or suggesting that I was hiding behind an impenetrable cyber-moniker.

To sign myself here as "William E. Mouser, Jr." or "Bill Mouser" feels sort of like I'm shedding or repudiating an identity. To sign on as "Fr. William E. Mouser, Jr" or "Fr. Bill Mouser" ... well, I would do that if needful, though it feels far more "stiff" than I'd like, and probably adds a smidgin of voltage to the irritation some folks in this community experience when encountering catholic titles for certain clergy.

But, I also happily acknowledge that others' blogs are not there for my comfort, especially mine.

If signing as "Fr. Bill" makes me an exception that weakens the policy you two (Prs. Tim and David) wish to implement, simply say so, and suggest a moniker you wish me to use.

Tim,

I agree entirely. Anonymity is not a boon to internet discussion.

Father Bill, I've never, ever, ever had the slightest concern about your signature. In fact, we consider your contributions here often far more worthwhile than our own.

With deep respect and affection,

What Fr. Bill says. If it's not obvious from the linkage that I'm Bert Perry, I'll sign on that way.

If someone posts emotionally neutral comments, having a real name is not so important. Almost always, someone who has a good reason for neutrality can confine himself to such comments.

Highly charged comments can also be very valuable, but there is so much temptation to be cruel or rude with them that it's a good discipline to have to reveal your real name.

As long as we're all coming clean, I might as well, too. My real name isn't David J. Wegener. That's more of a metaphor.

My real name is Mbeki Ndoko von Sponheim. I'm part African and part "what's called" of German descent. I'm sure you can understand why I don't sign by my real name.

I first met Tim and David Bayly while doing militia training in western Montana. We'd work on hand-to-hand fighting and knife skills in the mornings and then do our light arms training in the afternoon. In the evenings, we'd sit around a camp fire and tell jokes about women.

Doug Wilson, whom we only knew then as Fat Eddie the Apostle, would occasionally give devotional talks around the fire. They were usually just a re-hash from Dabney.

Things got interesting when a team of girls, led by the woman we now know as "Kamilla," started lobbing hand grenades at us from the woods. They were mad about our jokes which apparently the camp cook (whom we now know as R.C. Sproul, Jr.) passed on to them. We captured her and made her listen to the jokes until she finally agreed they were funny. Back then she went by Fighting Frieda. I don't actually know her real name.

That's also where I met Darryl. He ran the canteen and was always mad about something. He went by Darryl.

David

Very enjoyable. Thanks.

David,

I never knew you had it in you. Heidi and I were laughing very hard as I read this to her.

Mbeki

The moonshine I brought to the party must have been pretty good if you don't remember me!

Bike "Ma Deuce" Bubba

TUAD was there, too; but he called himself TUAU back then. He'd cry if we didn't end the night with Kum Bay Ya and a group hug. One night Doug and Darryl took him behind the woodshed and he never mentioned Kum Bay Ya or group hugs again.

That was the night he changed his name to TUAD.

Mason used to come. We accepted him, sort of. It was hard living with his rectangular circumlocutions.

Then came the night he tried to get us to listen to a Tim Keller sermon he had on his iPod. It was titled something like "Elder Brother: His Wife Made Him Do It."

We agreed to give it a listen, although no one was eager. But then he said he wouldn't turn the thing on until we'd each paid $5. Claimed it would all go toward the salary of Redeemer's Directress of the Diaconate.

At that point, Father Bill revolted. He said he didn't have $5, and if he did, he'd rather pay to listen to the just-released Jimi Hendrix cover of Ave Maria.

Great hilarity ensued, but I think Mason's feelings were hurt. He never came back, although we get occasional post cards from him with pictures of Ayn Rand and excerpts from Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged.

We save them up and send them to missionaries in Zambia who need paper for their home schooled children.

If only I was clever enough to join in on this fun...

Please help me to understand these two statements:

1. We wrote him privately asking that he identify himself. He declined.

2. Darryl Hart has identified himself from the very beginning.

Numbers one and two are two different men.

My Dear Mr. von Sponheim,

I was always surprised your team managed to capture me - I am afraid it means I never lived up to my legend as the Warrior Queen who was so fleet of foot, she could run across a field of grain without bending the heads or across the ocean without wetting her feet.

There was some powerful magic in those jokes.

ROTFLOL,

Contrary to what a particular sniping website claims, Kamilla is my true name.

OK, if there was any doubt in my mind before, now I know "David Wegener" is in fact the funniest man on earth.

Tim,

I didn't understand why Denver was confused until my wife pointed out the ambiguity of this statement: "After many personal exchanges with Darryl Hart in which many individuals requested that he identify himself, we wrote him privately asking that he identify himself."

While it might be obvious to many of us who have followed the fight, you might want to clarify in the post that it was the anonymous commenter that had many personal exchanges with Darryl Hart.

Right ho, Jake. Please thank Amanda for catching this!

Love,

" [Fr. Bill] said he didn't have $5, and if he did, he'd rather pay to listen to the just-released Jimi Hendrix cover of Ave Maria."

Actually, the cover done by Nine Inch Nails is far superior. And the name of their band has far more Biblical resonance than "Jimi Hendrix."

Add new comment