Our baby-slaughter President gets the Nobel Peace Prize...

Well said. And let us remember that about as many babies die per day as people died on 9/11. We will start wars around the world for the sake of those 3000 while we have a silent 9/11 every day at America's abortion clinics and do nothing. What's the point of fighting terrorism while our own Osama bin Ladens are quite efficiently slaughtering our children? Even Michael Jackson said "The children are our future." It seems impossible for any nation to maintain itself, let alone recover and grow, while it destroys--in modern parlance--"it's most valuable resource, it's hope for tomorrow."

There is a story in George Gilder's The Sprit of Enterprise about the man who made his first billion selling potatoes to McDonald's and his second investing in Micron Technology. His first success, however, was in the farm panic of the 1920s when every one was slaughtering their cattle because it cost more to feed them than they would get at market. At first, he bought ewes who were twins or triplets where the mother was not able to suckle them all. Later, he was given or bought very cheaply, animals the farmers were going to slaughter. Over-working himself through the winter, he feed his brood and kept them warm. Come spring, the market glut had become a scarcity and he made a handsome profit. The point is, is not one child worth more than many cattle? If we wanted to "get the economy back on track," should we not first invest in our future by placing a moratorium on abortion? We will give up our freedom through higher taxes, greater regulation, and "economic stimulus" but never relinquish the freedom to murder our most beautiful, intelligent, creative, productive, and valuable asset. When the economy does not recover because of our rulers' preference to treat the wound slightly with superficialities, the murderers will only have more reason to continue the slaughter of "unsupportables."

Michael Foster: "And shame on us if we remain silent."

There are liberal professing Christians who get upset and angry at conservative Christians who refuse to remain silent about what Obama has done in furthering the cause of abortion.

There are liberal professing Christians who want conservative Christians to not have a voice (or to mute their voices) in the Public Square.

Should conservative Christians yield to liberal professing Christians?

That way the fallen world will not have to see conflict between conservative Christians and liberal professing Christians and the Church's witness won't be criticized for all the fighting between Christians.

The Nobel Peace Prize is meaningless, and has been since they awarded it to a war criminal, terrorist and mass murderer named Yasser Arafat. They might as well award it posthumously to Jeffrey Dahmer, who was more deserving than Arafat.

Tim,

This Norwegian is ashamed of the land of her ancestors.

I truly thought this was a joke, tried hard to maintain that belief, ascribing it to a codeine-induced hallucination. Alas, I am having a rip-roaring reaction to the codeine so will be unable to maintain the illusion/hallucination for much longer!

This is one of the best things I've read about it, posted by a friend as his FB status:

"Chicago's political machine was in turmoil Friday after it was announced that President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. Daley's men were supposed to bribe the *Olympic* Committee."

Someday, I'd like to read that committee's justification. Are such things published? After a recent discussion on another blog, Romans 1:20-22 has been reverberating around my head. It's there again this morning.

If I didn't have hope in the one true, living God, I'd be in despair, utter despair.

Kamilla

I am outraged that Obama advocates to kill babies, but even more mad that the catholic church convinced me that we should vote for him! why did they endorse a man that supported something that the abhore?