Preparing for motherhood...

(Tim) Under the post, All in all, they're just bricks in the wall..., a reader asked if sex has anything to do with how we educate our children? As a pastor to many undergrad and grad students the past fifteen years here in Bloomington (home of Indiana University); but more, as the father of five children, two sons and three daughters; this question has been relentless in its presence in every aspect of my calling as pastor and father. As one effort to wrestle with the issue, back in the late nineties I wrote the following essay. It's been published here before (in August of 2004 and January of 2006), and it also ran in a print publication in the late nineties. Readers will note this piece does better at diagnosing a problem than providing a solution, but comments could go far to fill in the gap.

By the way, during our recent vacation, Mary Lee read a book that filled in some of the history of the origin of Home Economics as an academic discipline. You'll note I didn't know of its feminist roots when I wrote this piece, for which I apologize. Still, the late history of Home Economics' demise is well-documented and, given the discipline's history, highly ironic.

PREPARING FOR MOTHERHOOD

by Tim Bayly

My mother-in-law studied for her degree in Home Economics during the late '30s and early '40s, graduating summa cum laude from Oregon State University. After marrying her childhood sweetheart, she gave birth to 10 children in 14 years. Her husband, engaged for most of the years when the family was young as editorial director of a religious publishing house, brought home low wages, so frugality was a necessity and the degree served this young mother and her family well.

Food preservation, hygiene, cooking, sewing, and home budgeting were part of the home ec curriculum and, along with the liberal arts training which came with every bachelor's degree at the time, these young women graduated with specialized training for their profession of choice--motherhood. Other women took similarly helpful majors in Elementary Education, Bible, Christian Education (my own mother's major), and Nursing.

Then came the frontal assault on housewifery and motherhood carried out largely by a new and powerful aristocracy, the "Information Class." (Footnote 1) During the late '60s and early '70s this assault reached fever pitch and the academy was ground zero. College and university students were assigned propaganda tracts such as Ibsen's, A Doll's House, and joined the ranks of those determined to liberate the "Noras" of the world. (Footnote 2)

Oxford historian Paul Johnson provides interesting historical details on A Doll's House, noting that both Karl Marx's youngest daughter, Eleanor, and George Bernard Shaw took part in its first private reading in London, Eleanor playing the title role of Nora. Johnson writes, the "clear message" of A Doll's House was that "marriage is not sacrosanct, the husband's authority is open to challenge, [and] self-discovery matters more than anything else." Johnson concludes, "[Ibsen] really started the women's movement." (Footnote 3)

The discipline of home economics (also known as "household arts") was an early casualty...

Traditionally, home ec had enjoyed a comfortably apolitical niche in the world of higher education, and the guardians of this discipline had every reason to trust their academic peers would continue to be favorably disposed toward a curriculum so integrally tied to domestic tranquility. It was taken for granted that a dignified and competent wife and mother, devoted to her family, was a desirable constant in American culture.

To the feminists, home ec was anything but apolitical, so they attacked. The level of their hostility can be illustrated by Allan C. Carlson's account of an address given to the 1972 American Home Economics Association Convention by Robin Morgan, the feminist editor of Sisterhood Is Powerful:

[Morgan] laid the matter squarely on the line. The main emphasis of the organization, she reminded the delegates, was 'to reinforce three primary areas: marriage, the family, and the issue of consumerism .... Now those three areas.... [are] the primary areas that the radical women's movement is out to destroy. So one could say that as a radical feminist, I am here addressing the enemy.' Morgan charged that young women who passed through home economics courses were usually left as 'a limp, gibbering mass of jelly waiting for marriage.' Indeed, by feminist standards, home economics was so corrupted in its nature that the speaker had only one unambiguous recommendation: 'You can quit your jobs.' For those who must stay on, she urged that they work to eliminate the home economics requirement for junior and senior high school women and impose it instead on high school men. Home economists should also 'tell people the truth' about the housewife's role and 'the despair she faces in her life' and 'about the economic bigotry against women.' Above all, those who stayed in the obsolete profession must work to 'change' social mores, not reinforce them. For home economics was 'hooked' into institutions that were 'dying.' Morgan concluded: 'It's your choice whether you're going to crumble with that system ... while history rolls over you or whether you're going to move with [history]. I hope that you will join us--but we're going to win in any event.'

The battle for home ec was over almost before it began, and soon the deconstruction of this discipline was complete. (Footnote 4) Somewhere in mothballs there may be a beautifully preserved specimen of a home economics department, but at this sitting I don't recall running into one person with this major since my own entry into the world of higher education in 1971. A woman in our congregation who teaches home ec told me recently that her professional association changed its name from the National Association of Home Economics Teachers to the National Association of Consumer Education. "It no longer has the word 'home' in it!" she lamented.

The demise of home economics is indicative of a sea change in the thought patterns and habits of women standing at the edge of adult life today. Although elementary education, Christian education, nursing, and even home economics are still studied, these degrees are often chosen for their professional, and not domestic, value. Women make academic decisions about course work and majors with little thought of the value of specific areas of knowledge for running a home, raising a family, or educating children. Instead, the marketability of the degree is primary. Not surprisingly in a culture that disparages motherhood, we see a decline of conscious preparation for this task by women making academic, financial, and career decisions.

But in lusty defiance of all the rhetoric, men and women still marry, give birth to children, and raise a family of their own. Yet when children are born reality hits: Who will be this child's mother?

Not surprisingly the government's answer is more bureaucrats paid by more taxpayers, trained and certified by other bureaucrats. Thus the Information Class extends its influence to the earliest days of our nation's children.

There are significant economic reasons for our nation not to choose this direction, reasons obvious to thinking women and men from time immemorial. Chesterton sums up those reasons by pointing out that neither bureaucrats nor the money to pay them grow on trees, and that it is quite foolish to set up an industry to do what familial--and specifically maternal--love does naturally; "You are like a lunatic who should carefully water his garden with a watering-can, while holding up an umbrella to keep off the rain."

Seriously though, the reasons for Christians to raise, train, educate, and discipline their own children extend far beyond economic considerations. The making of the Christian home and the raising of children are at the very center of our calling as followers of Jesus Christ. Scripture commands fathers to provide for their families(Footnote 5) and mothers to "be domestic," (Footnote 6) to be devoted to their husbands, their children, and their home." (Footnote 7) Scripture calls mothers and fathers to train their children, (Footnote 8) to teach them about the Lord, (Footnote 9) to feed them the Word of God "from infancy," (Footnote 10) and to explain to them the traditions of our Most Holy Faith while sitting in their living rooms, walking through the neighborhood, riding in the car, and lying in bed. (Footnote 11) God has decreed that one purpose of Christian marriage is to raise up for Him "a godly seed." (Footnote 12)

To purport to be faithful to this task by packing our children off to "professionals" is often dishonest and disobedient.

Its dishonesty consists in the fact that, although many Christian parents give high-minded reasons for turning over the nursing, discipline, and instruction of their children to others, their true reasons are often embarrassingly secular: careers, financial security, and peer respect hold a higher place in their values than the approbation of God and the eternal well-being of the souls of their children.

This is not to say there aren't many Christian women and men who, due to tragic life circumstances, find themselves with no choice in such matters. Consider for instance divorcees who work full-time to pay rent and put food on their tables; widowers whose children are cared for during the day by grandparents; and wives and husbands whose physical or mental handicaps require such attention that childrearing must at least partially be provided for by non-family members.

Yet even in such circumstances the diligent Christian parent and his or her Christian community can do much to compensate, creatively and lovingly, for these circumstances. For an excellent series of stories on just such a family which, while having great hardship due to the absence of the father, maintains its health and integrity, see the series of "Five Little Peppers" books, including Five Little Peppers and How they Grew, Five Little Peppers Midway, Five Little Peppers Grown Up, and Five Little Peppers: Phronsie Pepper, published one hundred years ago by Lothrop Publishing Company in Boston. The first volume is dedicated, "To the memory of my mother; wise in counsel--tender in judgment, and in all charity--strengthful in Christian faith and purpose--I dedicate, with reverence, this simple book."

But in the too-normal case, face the matter squarely and we see that young women today find themselves in possession of all the old responsibilities as well as a considerable number of new ones, not the least of which is preparing for and competing within the wage-earning world for the level of responsibility, opportunity, and salary commensurate with their abilities. If they are successful in this competition, landing a good entry-level position with significant chance of improvement, they must be careful to maintain their productivity and commitment such that they are in no danger of losing the position they have prepared for and sought for so many years. Would it not be poor stewardship to gain the department headship only to lose it later while trying to meet the needs of one's spouse or children?

Today's college woman gathers knowledge and degrees useful for the world of business, education, service, and health care--not marriage and family life. Still, there is clear evidence that these same women have not disengaged from the timeless rituals of courtship and marriage. This then is the expectation of our culture for young women today: prepare for life-consuming responsibilities in the world and in the home, both at the same time, and then balance these responsibilities for as long as you can as well as you can.

Some men and women are called by God to the single life and are aware of having been given this spiritual grace. (Footnote 13) Most men and women, though, will be blessed by God with marriage and children and are therefore to raise up a godly seed for the Lord. To fail to acknowledge this and make decisions accordingly in the critical years of life is so sad, really. Why should Christians join the world in despising housewifery and motherhood?

When young Christian women are ashamed to admit their choice of school, of major, and of method of financing their education is directly related to their commitment to be ready for marriage, bearing children, and making a home, who would deny that the Church is taking her cues from the world?

Christians ask their children, "What are you going to be when you grow up?" Pity the poor young thing who answers, "I want to be a mother like Sarah, Hannah, Elizabeth, or Mary," because her indoctrination is about to begin.

"Yes dear, of course you will be a mother; but wouldn't you like to be a doctor or lawyer, or to play in an orchestra, too?"

Being a wife and mother isn't enough anymore, is it?

So it all starts. And before long, our daughters will be taught it's not sufficient to dream and plan for marriage and motherhood; they must dream and plan for a professional life--a "career"--also.

But before it's over, the pressures of these life choices will have a life of their own with concomitant (and tragic) results for the woman, her husband, and their family. The collegiate woman who follows the culturally preferred pathway comes out of college prepared to work in a profession which will give her material rewards commensurate only with her faithfulness to her colleagues and employer. Often she will arrive at her first position saddled with the substantial debt she has accumulated purchasing her education.

So when, within a year or two of graduation, marriage appears on the horizon, even if the couple desires to place parenthood above their reputation among their peers or their commitment to the woman's career, the debt accrued during their pursuit of professional training and accreditation sinks their hopes and they realize that having children is not feasible, financially. The same logic inexorably leads the woman and her husband to the conclusion that, in the event of an accidental pregnancy (accidental according to the finite plans of man, that is), soon after the baby arrives, mother will return to her profession and give over the care of the child to someone else. Thus the mother will keep on the cutting edge of her career and grow dull in her God-given vocation of motherhood.

This ought not to be. In God's Household, the pillar and foundation of the Truth, we must do our best to honor the Lord in every area of our lives, especially this critical matter of providing for the Christian home a Christian mother who is well-prepared in every way to fulfill her calling.

We must do everything in our power to legitimate--no, to honor--the calling of motherhood so our children grow up knowing no calling is higher. Where is the mother who has found she's too bright for the task of honing her child's mind and nurturing his heart?

A dear friend of mine, 83 years old, gave up her graduate fellowship from the Department of Astronomy at Harvard to marry another astronomer she had met there. Soon she had four children and, as they grew, she devoted herself to those children, teaching them everything possible. She never missed one of their science fairs and, foregoing the faculty wives' coffee klatches, she stayed home so she would be at the front door to welcome her children at the end of each school day.

"That's when they tell you everything," she explains. "When they walk in the door they're eager to tell all the things of the day--things are welling up inside of them then. If you don't get it then, you will not hear it, because they'll put it aside and do other things." My own mother adds that a parallel to meeting the children when they get home from school is staying up late at night, when the kids get older, to talk to them after their late-night excursions.

While her husband built telescopes, observed the sky, and published his research in the Astrophysical Journal, my friend trained, nurtured, fed, and disciplined her little ones into adulthood. Today, two of those four children have Ph.D.'s and the other two married Ph.D.'s. Forgetting for the moment the spiritual side of these children's instruction, let us ask the smaller question: Was this a waste of good intellectual talent? Would those children have been better off--even intellectually--had Mrs. Cuffey completed her graduate work and been awarded the terminal degree?

At this point some would argue for inserting a delicate caveat to indicate that there are many ways to raise children--many divergent styles of motherhood--and that some mothers can do it all, while others, due to native limitations, have to be more focused. But is it not true that Mrs. Cuffey and others following her path have, in fact, chosen the more excellent way, devoting themselves to their husbands, children, and home in a way that another mother of children who works full-time outside the home is unable to? In fact, was not Mrs. Cuffey's decision to give up her Harvard fellowship and turn toward home a decision laden with spiritual significance, not just for herself but for her husband, children, and future generations?

If we teach our daughters the high calling of motherhood and they take that calling on as their own, it will often lead them to make decisions similar to the one Mrs. Cuffey made. In such cases, certainly their own parents, but also the people of God, must be prepared to provide them fulsome support for any steps they take to decrease, that their husbands and children may increase, especially when those decisions close doors behind which lie prestigious honors and large financial rewards.

In her excellent booklet, Where's Mom: The High Calling of Wife and Mother in Biblical Perspective, Dorothy Patterson writes:

Homemaking, if pursued with energy, imagination, and skills, has as much challenge and opportunity, success and failure, growth and expansion, perks and incentives as any corporation, plus something no other position offers--working for people you love most and want to please the most.... Homemaking--being a full-time wife and mother--is not oppressive restraint of intellectual prowess for the community, but a release of wise instruction to your own household; it is ...the multiplication of a mother's legacy to the generations to come and the generous bestowal of all God meant a mother to give to those entrusted to her care. (Footnote 14)

As I write, leaves are falling, winter is quickly approaching, and autumn's smells and sounds draw me through fond memories back to my childhood home and my dear mother. There within that home Mother deposited the warmth and love which was its engine and which to this day causes her children and grandchildren such happiness when they return.

What sort of a home was it?

It was a home where the roof beams were raised to make way for grandparents preparing to die; a home where dinners were almost always late--seven or eight in the evening--because Mother was a perfectionist and had to serve food which showed her love, down to the details of the table service. Most nights, prior to our sitting down at the table we'd go around turning out all the lights while Mother lit the candles. She loved eating by candlelight, and we all got used to Grandpa's curmudgeonly lament, "A man would like to see what he's eating."

Northern Illinois winters were bitterly cold and, while wind blew through oaks standing guard around our home rustling brittle leaves clinging to branches, our picture window framed three little boys sitting at the hearth, roasting their backs as Mother read aloud from the Lazy-Boy chair. Her husband again gone on a speaking engagement, she led us in family devotions--Bible reading and prayer. Then, as the evening lengthened, she would pick up a book and read aloud to us until she fell asleep--often mid-sentence, or until the old mantle clock caught her eye. Jolted awake by the clock's chimes or coming to the end of a chapter, Mother closed the book, saying, "To bed, to bed, you sleepy heads."

We'd beg, "Oh mother, don't stop now! One more chapter, pleeease!" More often than not she'd relent, picking up where she'd just left off. Around that fireplace I was first introduced to the five little Peppers, A. A. Milne, P. G. Wodehouse, and many others.

Summertime Mother's attention turned to her gardens where she taught us to love beauty, but also to work. We'd complain about the work, at times, but each night the dinner table rewarded our labors with tomatoes, lettuce, cucumbers, green peppers, string beans, squash... all picked fresh that afternoon from our own soil. And the table's centerpiece would have been some combination of flowers from Mother's perennial garden, or rose buds cut from the hybrid teas carefully nursed through winter. When, as a high school student, I first read Pearl Buck's, The Good Earth, I thought she must have known Mother.

Though I acknowledge this vision is misty-eyed and could well cause some struggling mothers a bout of depression as they think about all the opportunities they've lost over the years, who can miss the priceless gift my family, as well as the missionaries, pastors, neighbors, and friends who sat and basked in the warmth of our home, received out of the abundance of the heart of this woman who chose to abandon her life to loving her husband and children, honoring her father and mother in their old age, and devoting herself to her home? Can I ever express my gratitude to a mother who was present, concerned, and content within those four walls which were the seedbed of most everything I have come to be? Such is the beauty of my mother who demonstrated her godliness in such domestic ways. May her tribe increase, by the grace of God.

Strength and dignity are her clothing, and she laughs at the time to come. She opens her mouth with wisdom, and the teaching of kindness is on her tongue. She looks well to the ways of her household, and does not eat the bread of idleness. Her children rise up and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praises her: "Many women have done excellently, but you surpass them all." Charm is deceitful, and beauty is vain, but a woman who fears the LORD is to be praised (Proverbs 31:25-30, RSV).

Footnotes:

(Footnote 1) Brigitte and Peter Berger, in The War Over the Family: Capturing the Middle Ground (Garden City: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1983).

(Footnote 2) For a sage essay on these matters, see G. K. Chesterton's, "The Drift from Domesticity," in The Thing (New York: Dodd, Mead & Company, 1948). Here Chesteron refers to Ibsen as "a very powerful dramatist and an exceedingly feeble philosopher."

(Footnote 3) Paul Johnson, The Intellectuals (New York: Harper & Row, 1988), p. 98.

(Footnote 4) See Allan C. Carlson, "Treason of the Professions: The Case of Home Economics," The Family in America, (August 1987).

(Footnote 5) Cf. Isa. 58:6,7; 2 Cor. 12:14; 1 Tim. 5:4 . Especially, 1 Tim. 5:8: "If anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for his immediate family, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever."

(Footnote 6) Titus 2:5 in the Revised Standard Version.

(Footnote 7) "Likewise, teach the older women to be reverent in the way they live, not to be slanderers or addicted to much wine, but to teach what is good. 4 Then they can train the younger women to love their husbands and children, 5 to be self-controlled and pure, to be busy at home, to be kind, and to be subject to their husbands, so that no-one will malign the word of God" (Titus 2:3-5).

(Footnote 8) Prov. 22:6.

(Footnote 9) "Fathers, do not exasperate your children; instead, bring them up in the training and instruction of the Lord" (Eph. 6:4, NIV).

(Footnote 10) "But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have become convinced of, because you know those from whom you learned it, and how from infancy you have known the holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus" (2 Tim. 3:14,15, NIV).

(Footnote 11) Deut. 11:18-21; Josh. 4:21-24; and Exod. 12:26-28. Also, Deut. 6:6-8: "These commandments that I give you today are to be upon your hearts. Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up. Tie them as symbols on your hands and bind them on your foreheads" (NIV).

(Footnote 12) "And did not he make one? Yet had he the residue of the spirit. And wherefore one? That he might seek a godly seed. Therefore take heed to your spirit, and let none deal treacherously against the wife of his youth" (Mal. 2:15, KJV).

(Footnote 13) See the Apostle Paul's discussion of this subject in 1 Cor. 7.

(Footnote 14) Where's Mom: The High Calling of Wife and Mother in Biblical Perspective, by Dorothy Patterson..

Comments

I've noticed over the years that women who have careers outside of the home are generally not absolved from their domestic duties. They still do all the cooking,cleaning,and childcare. These women are chronically exhausted,understandably resentful toward their husbands,and often bitter. I've also observed that women who make disparaging comments to my wife for staying home and taking care of our six children are usually unfulfilled and that their comments are motivated by jealousy.

Wow.

What a beautifully expressed lament.

And also an exhortation and encouragement for Christians to not be be ashamed of biblical manhood and biblical womanhood.

May this message spread far and wide and deep.

Thank you, Tim. This is a beautiful encouragement to me.

Well said. My wife struggles even in our fundamental church with her blessed choice to be there for our kids. The world has crept in, and it's a struggle to keep on track.

The bright side of the struggle is that we get to clearly see the need. How many of our friends are squandering their paychecks because they've never learned how to create a wardrobe (as opposed to filling their closets with junk), design a working kitchen, and so on?

> You'll note I didn't know of [Home Economics'] feminist roots when I wrote this piece

I'd be interested in hearing more about the feminism behind it.

Working alongside my husband in the college ministry, I ache for young women that have bought the deception that they are worth more than to stay at home. And it makes me all the more eager to teach and show them that it is a duty that is freeing and brings much joy and delight.
I came from a (prenatal) doctors appointment this afternoon in which upon hearing that my son, that is already here, is 17 months old, my doctor said, "Oh my gosh, you're going to be busy!" As I drove away I smiled and remembered what the Bible says about idleness. I will be busy and tired, but my energy won't be wasted. I pray God makes me a mother like Mrs. Cuffey and yours, Tim.

Thank you for your truthful words. I am a male nurse and since approximately 80 percent of my co-workers are female I get so many of the negatives in action. Many of these women's husband do not do their share of the household duties and so they come home tired and immediately have to step into the domestic role. I hear their fustration almost everyday. My wife heard a christian lady speaker say that women today have taken on roles that God never meant for them to assume and are paying the price for it physically and spiritually. I believe that to be true. Our church often has a hard time meeting our needs to fellow beievers because so many women work outside the home that no one hardly has time to make a meal for a sick person. (May the Lord bless those that do after a long day)> I don't know the future of the church but it sure looks discouraging to me.

Beautiful! Excellent, Tim. Most encouraging as well.

Can you tell us what book Mary Lee was reading?

Kamilla

That's pretty funny. Yup, A Doll's House, first class in college (the one I met Ginger in) - and The Yellow Wallpaper later at IU.

In my HS, Home Ec was requried for all students as well as shop (nice equality) and in Home Ec our final had an essay about the pros and cons of a high school girl choosing to have an abortion. This was Valley Stream, NY circa 1989.

At 5-day clubs we had Ben Walker, and he was telling us afterward about how in Germany they actually profess that it's Gov's job to raise children but parents job to merely nurture them.

One of my close Christian relatives always used to say to Ginger, "Wow, must be nice to be able to stay home" (meanwhile they lived in a half million dollar house) and then after staying home with her kids over the Christmas break would say, "Ugh, I couldn't stand it if I had to stay home with them" - this is typical. If you're a homeschooler the insults become more pronounced, punctuated sometimes by questions about the law reminiscent of veiled threats. The Enemy is certainly at work.

So out of one side of their mouth they insult stay at home moms and out of the other they testify to how difficult the job is and how necessity doesn't keep them from it.

Oh that's too funny: "she would pick up a book and read aloud to us until she fell asleep--often mid-sentence"

Ginger does this to our kids all the time - waking to the kids laughing, "Mom! You're doing it again!"

Tim, you describe all of this perfectly, it's too bad the wives are too busy doing the work you describe, it would be great to hear them - since most of those I know defend their position as eloquently as you do - the feminists who ever read this blog will assume we imprison our wives at home - when instead, tears well in my wife's eyes at the mere mention of ever leaving for the vain pleasures of a career.

-Clint

Uncle Tim, thank you for writing this. The whole time I was reading, I kept thinking, "Yes, yes YES; that's exactly it." Maybe I should print this off and hand it to someone anytime they ask me what my major is.

Having read all the posts on this thread I was reminded of a passage from Richard Weaver's "Ideas Have Consequences". Please allow the following quote: "If we say that woman is identical with man except in that small matter of division of labor in the procreation of the species, which the most rabid egalitarian is driven to accept, there is no reason why she should not do man's work (and by extension, there is no reason why she should not be bombed along with him). So hordes of women have gone into industry and business, where the vast majority of them labor without heart and without incentive. Conscious of their displacement, they see no ideal in the task. And, in fact they are not treated as equals,they have been made the victims of a transparent deception.....With her superior closeness to nature,her intuitive realism, her unfailing ability to detect the sophistry in mere intellectuality, how was she ever cozened into the mistake of going modern? Perhaps it was the decay of chivalry in men that proved too much. After the gentleman went, the lady had to go too".

Beautiful, Don.

--One of my close Christian relatives always used to say to Ginger, "Wow, must be nice to be able to stay home" (meanwhile they lived in a half million dollar house) --Clint

I tell people that we're in a position that I am able to stay home with our kids. I am trying to communicate that it is a blessing that I am able to do this, but I just realized today that people probably take that to mean we're wealthy and so I'm able to "not work". That's not what I mean at all!

We have made a conscious decision for me to stay home with our kids because we believe it is right and we have made certain sacrifices in order to do it (as does anyone). But how do I say that to someone (like a working mom) who asks what I do without coming across that I'm saying I am superior to her because I have my priorities straight?

Michal,

Honestly, this is sort of what's going on on the other blog - with this guy Matt L. calling your dad "arrogant" - there's a point when you realize that you will be torn down, even at times by your brothers and sisters in Christ, for doing the right thing and no amount of trying to make it palatable will help.

I could give you a ton of examples from people I know, but let me just say, you wouldn't believe the absurd lies people tell themselves to avoid seeing the truth, don't worry about figuring out the deceitfulness of sin - but rather live the obvious transparency of righteousness.

Every week that any protesters bring their children to Planned Parenthood, someone always says something absurd like, "that jacket isn't warm enough" (in 70 degree weather) etc. There's no point in engaging them on that level, they just feel guilty that their kids are being slaughtered inside, and by their own hand.

I used to hide my sin so that I'd be a good witness - people thought we were the Brady Bunch (or hypocrites) and didn't see Christ, later I confessed it but then people seemed to be even more convicted and found more reasons to not see Christ. I realized that they were seeing Christ all over in their lives and blinding themselves - it wasn't necessarily me doing something.

If you have money they'll say, "Oh, it's easy for her she's rich." If you don't they'll say, "Oh, she doesn't have the money to take care of her kids, she should go to work." You can't win that way.

I'd guess that there's nothing different you can or do, just let your life be known to them and though they'll pretend that somehow what you do doesn't apply to them, they know and it does and it's a witness. (But also, look for those times to speak the gospel fully - I'm bad about that.)

-Clint

> Being a wife and mother isn't enough anymore, is it?

So it all starts. And before long, our daughters will be taught it's not sufficient to dream and plan for marriage and motherhood; they must dream and plan for a professional life--a "career"--also. Yet even in such circumstances the diligent Christian parent and his or her Christian community can do much to compensate, creatively and lovingly, for these circumstances. <

I am constantly pressured into believing that it is weak, foolish, lazy, and selfish for someone in my position (with an opportunity to go to professional school) to turn that down so I can get married and have a family "right away", and then expect others to hand over the financial support when/if my future husband loses his job or dies. Those who pressure me in this way uphold that I cannot expect others to pay for my poor choice not to buy into the "life insurance policy" of a professional degree. So they insist I must be patient and wait until I have earned it - I suppose that means earning the degree means I have earned the right to marry. They would claim that a woman without this "great" opportunity to have such security in a professional degree is a different case. Those women, they contend, would be the kind of women that need the support from family and church when they are widowed. But women who turn down opportunities to be self-sufficient, those women have foolishly put themselves in a position that could be preventing the support of "those other widows" who really need it.

In this day and age, can a woman really "just get married"? Doesn't she need SOMETHING (ie. SOME KIND OF DEGREE) that will help her provide for her children IF her husband dies?

And of course, these same people also argue that I cannot expect to be a full time stay-at-home mother unless I marry a wealthy man. That is my other fear - thanks Michal for your post! You and other women I know at CGS give me a lot of hope. I need to hear and see more of this.

Hypothesis for testing: that Christian parents are encouraging their daughters to get professional education, in case there isn't a Christian man for them to marry, and they need the 'backup option'.

When we say that 'some men and women are called to the single life', it might be more accurate to say, 'some men and more women'. That is a function, I think, of our evangelism: it seems to be much more effective with adult women, married or single, than with adult men, married or single. (That also explains why in our churches we will always have a good number of married women whose husbands are unsaved, because the women came to faith after marriage).

At any rate, would welcome critical comment on this. I know that the homeschooling community does have these debates; although they seem to forget that once their young /men/ are ready for marriage, there is already a slight but visible surplus of young women, because of the effects of the evangelism I've outlined above.

Perhaps it is a function of the preaching but there seem to be more young men ready and anxious to marry in the two churches I've been heavily involved with. But given most preaching these days, I'd agree that women respond more readily.

-Clint

Earlier in the blog, including in the interview with Elisabeth Elliot, you have mentioned exalting single women and affirming the calling of singleness. But how can this be done if a woman's highest calling is to be a wife and a mother?

>>how can this be done if a woman's highest calling is to be a wife and a mother...

A single woman is not called to be a mother, so it can't be her highest callling. Unless, of course, she gets married and God allows her and her husband to have children. Then, after being a wife, the privileges of childbearing and childrearing become her highest calling. This is the reason Titus 2 commands older women to teach younger women to be "domestic" or "keepers at home." Other callings are not to be allowed to trump this highest one.

Same with man--there's no higher calling than being a husband and father. Unless, of course, one is single. Then God's calling is singleness which, by definition, is not husbandry or fatherhood.

Love,

Hi Tim

I wonder if your point might be made more clearly by saying that your "highest calling" is to be obedient to the specific one God gives you; so, if a man is called to be a husband, then [normally] he is to be a husband and father; and if single, to be single.

If this isn't worded clearly, it is not surprising that people think that, "a woman's highest calling is to be a wife and mother" (to quote c).

Dear Ross,

Even in the case of Mother Theresa, though, she was after all a mother.

Love,

I understand, and agree, with most of what is being said but I just don't think the church knows how to deal with the modern single woman. There are factors that can't be avoided that keep people single longer than they'd like, even if the current trend to marry later is a sinful reflection of the culture at large. I feel like what is often promoted is a glorification of motherhood and domesticity above all things...if a woman was created to keep the home, and fulfilling that calling is what most puts her in right relationship with God, then is a single woman who works full time and doesn't keep home for her husband or children less spiritual than a married woman? Intentional or not, that's often how it comes across.

C,

I myself am a 30 year old single woman, and I too feel like the church often isn't too sure what to do with us. I can get discouraged if I think about that too often, so I have to discipline myself not to. Instead of thinking about how the church doesn't know what to do with me and how to fix that, I do know what I am to do for the church. (The quote "think not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country" just popped in my head, and that, for me, is the only response I can really think of in this situation!)

While I have no home to keep for a husband or children, I still have a home I can keep---and I don't just mean keeping it tidy and well decorated. I am blessed to be able to be domestic almost whenever I like--I can have just about anybody over at my house for dinner, just about anytime. Having that flexibility is lovely! I enjoy cooking dinner for friends, and getting to know people more over a meal. Also as a single woman, I have the flexibility to go to someone else's house and minister to them, whether it be by cooking for a new mother (who already has many mouths to feed) or doing the gardening for them, or walking their dog--get what I mean? The opportunities for me to be domestic are nearly endless.

I understand what you are saying, that the church doesn't know what to do with us. Yet I, as a single woman, know what to do with me! God's Word talks about being domestic and keeping home and serving others, but it never says I have to be married to do those things. And while I cannot physically be a mother, I can work on becoming a spiritual mother to many (just as many, many women in my church have been to me).

I know it can SEEM as though the church makes it look like married women are more right with God or more spiritual, yet we know from Scripture that that isn't true. Christ is what makes us right with God, and nothing else. For me, I do my best to ignore how things SEEM, and focus on what I know is TRUE.

I don't know if any of this is helpful or not to anyone, but these are the thoughts of one modern, single 30 year old woman.

That does help! I think you're exactly right. I guess I just felt like the blog post came close to over-glorifying the domesticities of motherhood when what it means to be a Christian woman is so much broader than that.

For instance, I love decorating and design, but I don't necessarily think it comes from a spiritual mandate of homemaking. I love it as a single working woman and currently not as a service to my husband and family, although I imagine one day God will use my gifts and enjoyment in that area if I end up as a stay-at-home mom. But my love of certain domestic things don't have anything to do with being a mother or not. Nor do all mothers need to exult in all things domestic, and a self-admittedly "misty-eyed" view can, in my opinion, veer too close to saying that these outward signs are the highest representation of a mother's spiritual life.

Today's "modern" woman (sometimes whether single or not) needs not forget domestic exercises, but might not employ them all in her life and shouldn't be considered unwise or unholy to consider careers outside the home economic or educational sphere. None of us are guaranteed tomorrow, much less whether or not we will marry, and so I don't think it's wrong to advance in our careers while we are childless. Again, I believe it's viewing women's gifts, talents and abilities narrowly to assume they would all like to major in nursing, home ec, or child development. Some will choose careers in completely unrelated fields, while at the same time practicing domestic tasks for their friends and families, then oneday raising kids of their own. And not every single woman wants to serve in the children's ministry at church, and that is ok.

There are many benefits to getting a degree and a woman shouldn't worry this makes her look like a feminist, or someone who is uninterested in domestic life. It doesn't have to be either/or.

c,

I think much of what you say is true, and I agree with your general gist.

WITH THAT SAID---I very much understand, and appreciate this entry that Tim (who is my pastor) posted.

I think it is terrific that you, and many other women I'm sure, love design and decorating, but don't necessarily think those things immediately as "domestic" activities and whatnot. It will be wonderful, for sure, should the Lord give you a husband and make you a mother, because something you enjoy so much CAN be a domestic thing, even if you don't think of it as so!

Yet we live in a time where domesticity is poo pooed. If a woman says today that she wants to be a mother and wife, she often gets looks and sneers and the awful comment "That's all? No really, what do you want to DO with your life?" That's literally what someone has told me when I've said those things. (either that, or a dropped jaw and total silence. Neither are encouraging).

There are scores of people today who think it's nice to have a baby, but after a while, mom should be "useful" again, and get back in to the work force. Her talents, skills, efforts, and sacrifices at home are absolutely ignored by many today, and we should take care not to fall in to that line of thinking. We think we'd never fall in to that, after all, we believe the Bible, right? Yet we are corrupt, and we need to constantly be renewing our mind with God's Word, and in todays world and the hostility that is aimed towards stay at home moms, we ESPECIALLY need to hear again about how God has commanded wives and mothers to be keepers of the home, and how that is a GOOD thing!

So it is with that in mind that makes me so thankful for Tim posting this. Hearing stories of people who are deeply thankful that their mothers were able to stay home and care for them is encouraging. I love it when Proverbs 31 comes true, and I hear the children of godly women rise up and call their mothers blessed. I can't tell you the joy I get when I hear husbands acknowledging and praising the work their wives do at home--often it is work that the world rolls its eyes at, or just plain doesn't notice or care about. Yet this work, the work of cooking, cleaning, etc etc---all of it is GOOD WORK, and it is work that is done for husbands and children, but ultimately is done for the Lord. We must be careful in not dismissing it or thinking lightly of it.

Regarding advancing a career while childless--I don't think that is wrong in and of itself, yet we have to be so so careful. I hope you (and others reading) can understand my little "yes, but"'s after certain sentences. I speak from my own experience, and also from watching the experience of others when I write such caveats. We are sinful men, and unfortunately things we do, say, and think are often in and of themselves okay, yet they are never just in and of themselves! How often do thoughts of our own glory creep in? How often do our desires over doing God's will affect things? Sadly, often.

I have much more I could say regarding this topic, as it is one I think of often, yet I am hoping you understand my general ideas.

yes once again that makes sense and I agree with you! In fact I plan on staying home when I have kids and I was raised with a stay-at-home mom. The attitude of our whole family was to value that position and that it was no less worthy than any other. I know that career will never satisfy in the way relationships will. So really I should have stated up front that I agree with the tenets of the blog post and our society's abysmal reaction to those who value family over career. And even though my love for decorating isn't "family-motivated" right now, I easily see how it will be one day.

I see the necessity of the post, I just think there may be a happy medium to be found. I'm trying to represent a part of the population that can be overlooked in the conservative church, which is a conservative non-feminist woman with a desire for family but a current career and desire to do my best in the work world. I just want people to remember that it's possible to strive for a good degree or a good job without being a feminist, and that if the church glorifies motherhood as the "only" or "highest" or "most sanctified place" a woman can live in, it neglects all the women who are not mothers. This post never said or led me to believe that and in fact I don't feel at all marginalized or overlooked in my local church body. I just think we can over-sentimentalize certain aspects of motherhood and certain specific aspects of domesticity that are extra-biblical, and it can leave women who don't fit the narrow criteria feeling lumped in with the feminists.

And while I agree that there is so much temptation for greed or love of power to come into play concerning careers, I would say this is more of a human problem than a female problem. Obviously the lure of career can tempt women away from stay-at-home motherhood, but that's not reason enough for women to stop having careers in general. Males will face temptations in their careers, as well.

But I feel like most people would probably agree with me there, and I think I'm reaching above and beyond the original post. I don't really know what I'm trying to say here. I guess just beware the dangers of over-romanticisng a specific brand of domesticity at risk of possible exclusion of women in the church with their hearts in the right place.

c,

I definitely have appreciated your posts, and am pretty sure we are on the same page. God bless you in your work, domestic and otherwise! :-)

>And while I agree that there is so much temptation for greed or love of power to come into play concerning careers, I would say this is more of a human problem than a female problem. Obviously the lure of career can tempt women away from stay-at-home motherhood, but that's not reason enough for women to stop having careers in general. Males will face temptations in their careers, as well.

I am concerned that we have made so many concessions to the culture that we can no longer see potential "problems". The dangers of a sexually mixed job market are not simply "human", as if the sex of the employees is of no consequence. There are many greater pitfalls than greed and power as we mix men and women in the workforce. There is adultery, fornication, and a clouding of authoritative roles. There is the masculinization of women and the feminization of men. There is the damage to the family as single income wages are done away with and wives and husbands have to be concerned about their spouses as they take business trips with members of the opposite sex. And the list goes on...

The danger in our time is not our over-romanticization of domesticity. The danger in our time is our complete unfamiliarity with the far reaching consequences of our rebellion against God's prescription for the sexes.

I agree there are gender differences, and I don't believe the sex of the employee doesn't make any difference, which is why I listed possible gender-specific temptations, but what should a woman do before she has a home and family? Are there certain careers that should be universally avoided by women?

Thanks Chantal, for all your encouragement!

Add new comment