Brian McLaren bloviating his shame...
(Tim) Three or four of you have now sent me notification that Emergent Church leader Brian McLaren is observing the Muslim holy days of Ramadan this year. Joining with them in their daily fast/feast cycle, McLaren makes this promise in behalf of himself and all those following him in his folly:
Good readers, when you and your pastor start to refer to our only Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, King of Kings and Lord of Lords, Only Begotten Son of the Father as "our own faith tradition," your soul is in peril and you need to get out of that church and find a true Christian church where your own soul, as well as that of your wife and children, will be guarded--not sold for fame and fortune. Do it quickly.
But back to His Pomposity: McLaren has a bunch of reasons for turning towards Mecca and he's spreading all of them across the known world. If you think of the Emergent Church leaders as publicity hounds...
issuing press releases aimed at getting coverage on Entertainment Tonight, your insight into everything they do will grow by leaps and bounds.
Looking for a perfect send-up of McLaren's press release telling the world he's not at all like the Prophet Elijah on top of Mt. Carmel or the Apostle Paul in the Areopagus? Read this. It's Doug following the lead of Elijah mocking the prophets of Baal and their god (1Kings 18).




Comments
From McLaren's blog post:
"Just as Jesus, a devout Jew, overcame religious prejudice and learned from a Syrophonecian woman and was inspired by her faith two thousand years ago (Matthew 15:21 ff, Mark 7:24 ff), we seek to learn from our Muslim sisters and brothers today."
Oh my.
Kamilla
The difference: Jesus compared the Syrophonecian woman to a dog, and she humbly embraced the metaphor. Muslims compare Christians to dogs and would respond violently if we reciprocated.
I love Doug Wilson's line when he writes:
"Do I not have peculiar gifts in the arena of fisking? Was I not born for just such occasions? With a sigh, I put aside my casual evening, and go out to my shop to find the nine-pound sledge."
I had to laugh at that one.
Here's an historic parallel from a Christian Jewish friend:
"I had a whole bunch of relatives who sang Deutschland Uber Alles and cheered the Kaiser, and read Goethe and Schiller. But come 1933, it did not turn them into Germans."
Kamilla
> Here's an historic parallel from a Christian Jewish friend...
How prophetic, Kamilla.
> "But come 1933, it did not turn them into Germans."
Nor were the Nazis the least bit appreciative of all their patriotism, good citizenship and hard work.
The Quran makes no distinction between respectful and non-respectful Christians, when it comes to their treatment by Muslims in power.
> "I had a whole bunch of relatives who sang Deutschland Uber Alles and cheered the Kaiser, and read Goethe and Schiller."
It is scary how little history that is ultimately related to their own well-being the younger generations are cognizant of. They are not aware of how the greatest evils foisted upon mankind were done in the name of peace, progress, security, reform, etc., and how the masses blindly went along with so much of it.
Such things as Michael Jackson's 51st birthday today are more important.
Tim, your comment about McLaren referring to Christ as "our own faith tradition" reminds me of a quote of McLaren's from his book The Last Word and the Word After That:
“Our problem is that we use the idea of hell precisely the way the Pharisees did, exactly the opposite of the way Jesus did. We say everyone not of our elite party—the party of people who believe in certain doctrines, however they’re defined—are excluded and will face not only our rejection in this life but also God’s eternal rejection and scorn forever” (The Last Word, 163).
[To borrow your idea, Tim] When a pastor starts to refer to the rejecting and spurning of the King of the Universe, the refusing his offer of salvation and the substitution of his painful death as "not of our elite party"...
Don't ever use the word bloviate in my presence.
"When a pastor starts to refer to the rejecting and spurning of the King of the Universe … "
I can remember vividly the first (and only) time I thought I was looking at a living human male whom I also thought was eternally damned. How, do you suppose, I came to think such a thing?
It was in an Ash Wednesday service in the mainline Episcopal Church, in the cathedral in Nashville, TN. My wife and I had overnighted near the cathedral on a ministry trip up to Ohio, specifically so we could make the Ash Wednesday service early in the morning before continuing on our journey.
The Book of Common Prayer is nothing if not Trinitarian, replete with prayers, praises, and petitions addressed to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost. But that Ash Wednesday, I never heard this name for God once.
Instead, all we heard was "in the name God the Creator, God the Redeemer, and God the Sanctifier" and other such formulas that renamed God in terms of his roles or functions toward us.
Now, with no context, one might think the priest to be daffy. Or avante garde. Or liturgically innovative. But I knew the context -- the same context that now courses through the Episcopal Church, coarsening the last tattered shreds of any orthodoxy remaining in it. That context was (and is) nothing other than a virulent feminism set on deconstructing the Patriachal Christianity that is the heritage of any mere Christian, and erecting in its place a modalistic unitarianism determined to erase forever any memory of the old patriarchal faith.
In such a context, to deliberately *avoid* the name Father, Son, and Holy Spirit and to replace it with some other sexless formula … well, it was tantamount to a refusal to confess the Son as Son, and also to avoid confessing the Father as Father. And, this before a congregation of several hundred attending this early service before going on to their jobs.
In the midst of one of these trendy substitutions, the following words from Matthew rose in my mind: "32 “Therefore whoever confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father who is in heaven. 33 But whoever denies Me before men, him I will also deny before My Father who is in heaven."
Does Jesus' denying a man before His Father in heaven equate to damnation? I've never had such a case of goosebumps in my life, then or since.
One word sums up Wilson's post admirably:
Tashlan.
It is as if McLaren never read the books of history describing His response to the abominations at Samaria.
>"We are deeply committed Christians."
A more self deluded assertion is difficult to imagine. I'm trying to imagine Mclaren explaining these deeply held committments in accordance with his decision to observe Ramadan to a Christian who was more intimately acquainted with the nature of Islam-perhaps a Knight of St John during the siege of Malta.
>"We want to come close to our Muslem neighbors."
I know some Armenian Christians who would advise you not to get too close.
>"Among the core values of Ramadan are...resolving conflict."
Yes, and the Islamic solution to conflict involving multicultural tensions has typically featured such tested and time honored approaches as slavery and genocide.
As a mere point of order, I HAVE in the past undertaken the Ramadan fast. I felt called to use the inevitable hunger pangs as a private call to prayer for God to call Muslims to Himself, an idea suggested by a missionary to the Muslim world our church had been priveledged to have visit during a Missions Conference. Still a great idea that I should begin again.
Unlike Mr. Mclaren, however, I did not (still don't) have the platform for issuing such pluralistic and self-congratulatory inanities. Probably a good thing, too, I haven't discovered such a profound gift of double-speak.
>>I felt called to use the inevitable hunger pangs as a private call to prayer for God to call Muslims to Himself
Excellent missional work.
Add new comment