"If they desire his help..."
(Tim, w/thanks to my Mary Lee) The July 18, 2009 issue of World ran an article about South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford's confession of adultery. The article is worth reading, especially if you're a frequent traveler, rich, or influential. Wealth is deceitful and pride goes before the fall.
Three statements stuck out to me.
First, why am I not surprised that YWAM's Virginia rep knew nothing about YWAM's ownership of the Fellowship's $1.8 million C Street home, and that when World asked them for clarification, the Fellowship declined to respond?
Second, the article admits it's common for politicians to have no church home or to skip church. This is increasingly true of missionaries, also, so here at Church of the Good Shepherd we've begun to implement standards with the missionaries our church supports. They must be a part of a local church, where they work, as well as hold permanent membership in an evangelical Bible-believing church that they and the church recognize as their home church.
Third, to the degree that Gov. Mark Sanford had a church, he claimed it was an evangelical congregation called Seacoast Church in Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina. He sometimes attended an Episcopal congregation when he was working in the capital, but Seacoast is his home church.
So, when Gov. Sanford publicly confessed to adultery, how did his Seacoast pastor respond?
Here's...
precisely what World reports:
Greg Surrratt, the Mount Pleasant minister who Sanford considers his pastor, says his congregation is "heartbroken" over Sanford's fall, but declined to discuss whether he had known about the governor's infidelity before his press conference. Surratt said he will help the Sanfords if they desire his help.
"If they desire his help?" Is this the new standard for pastoral care in the evangelical church? We offer help and wait to see if it's wanted? It's called hands-off pastoral care--we aim to please. Secoast Church has 10,000 members, by the way.




Comments
How about some of that...what is it called???
Oh Yea, CHURCH DISCIPLINE
What do you expect the Pastor to say? Would you talk to the press about a member of your church?
Just down the street from the main Seacoast 'campus' (it's multi-location of course) is a large Baptist Church with a Reformed Baptist pastor. John Owen, The Institutes, Valley of Vision Prayers, & Spurgeon regularly referred to in the service bulletin and service. The church is often referred to as the 'big black hole of the PCA' in Charleston). When we visited one of our daughter's and son-in-law there a few weeks ago (they are members, as are many devout Christians from the medical school there), the service ended with the public announcement of what we'd call an ex-communication - same issue. The contrast with Seacoast is not unexpected.
How encouraging, Warren! Can you tell us more about the context for the "big black hole" statement? Are there PCA churches nearby? If so, do they hold on to the paedobaptists or not? If not, why not?
If someone would find it easier to answer these questions anonymously, please feel free.
What a sweeping indictment of both Seacoast Church and Pastor Greg Surratt with no more knowledge of the situation than a paragraph in World Magazine.
If Pastor Surratt did know of Gov. Sandford's infidelity, or the sins of any other member of the church for that matter, it would be wildly inappropriate to comment on it to a reporter. Further, if Pastor Surratt were working with the Sanfords to bring repentance and reconciliation (a fact neither you nor your readers have any insight into), public excommunication would be completely uncalled for at this time. Finally, if the Sanfords did not desire any input from Pastor Surratt he would be hard pressed to provide help. If the sin continued without repentance then a form of church discipline would be in order. Excommunication, however, should be the final, not the first response of any pastor.
Or Seacoast could line up all of the sinners in the church and stone them. Anyone care to cast the first stone?
Tim, I believe there are multiple reasons for the 'big black hole of the PCA' designation - not entirely related to each other. What got one of our older daughters and son-in-law (both from PCA background) 'hooked' was a pre-existing Medical Campus Ministry ("MCO")sponsored by this church (East Cooper Baptist). It's very large and active ministry and dominates real organized Christian ministry at the medical campus. Charleston is what I'd call a 'small town city', and MUSC is a huge economic, physical, and social presence there. Interestingly, some other branches of "MCO" at other medical schools are sponsored by PCA churches (First Pres in Augusta GA, and 10th in Philly).
I can't speak about the PCA churches right around Charleston as I'm a couple hours down the coast. I do have some notion of other reasons for the 'big black hole' designation, and their decision to go Reformed Baptist, but would rather not put them on a public post - I gotta live here and this is a small state.
>>Anyone care to cast the first stone?
Dear Anonymous,
You're jumping to conclusions not warranted by what's been written. It's not a question of discipline, but simply of recognizing the responsibility a pastor has to provide pastoral care regardless of whether it is or is not desired.
Seacoast's pastor has given the quote to "World," and it's his own words that indicate his help would only be given if it is desired.
Warmly,
>>> it's his own words that
>>> indicate his help would
>>> only be given if it is desired.
Indeed. There are a number of things the pastor could have said, with this being one of the worst. For example (if the church was practicing discipline as ordered in Scripture) "We are working with Mr. Sanford on this matter and all details are private." If even that is TMI, then a "No comment on internal church matters" would have worked too. Instead, the pastor chose to publicly abandon the responsibility given to him by God, in front of the entire world.
I am an infrequent commenter and frequent lurker around here. My family lives in Charleston, SC, and we are members a PCA church here. The description of Seacoast is more accurate than you know. It exists to inoculate people to true Christianity.
The PCA churches here do tend to hold onto paedobaptists in general, once they have families. The ministry of East Cooper Baptist is very strong, as has been said, at the Medical University and is fairly strong at the other three major universities in town. Most young singles (and young marrieds with no kids) tend to go where the other young singles are, which is at East Cooper Baptist (ECBC). Some young people are faithful members of PCA churches in town, but there is a strong pull to be where other people are more like them. In my experience, those who bolt for ECBC have had an underemphasis on doctrine in their home churches. (ECBC's pastor considers himself a 3 1/2 point Calvinist or so, so we do consider that church to be an ally of sorts.)
RE: Rich's comment "In my experience, those who bolt for ECBC have had an underemphasis on doctrine in their home churches." Generally, I'd agree, with the caveat that those involved with the Medical Campus ministry have a very strong vocational pull that can trump a strong doctrine background. Being able to express your Reformed faith in a context that draws on the essence of your vocation can be extremely strong. I imagine that type of vocational pull explains all sorts of church affiliations.
Here's another example of a pastoral response to a prominent church member's infidelity:
Appearing Thursday on CBS' "The Early Show", the McNairs' family pastor in Nashville deflected questions about the quarterback's affair with a woman who police confirmed killed him before committing suicide.
"His death primarily was the shock," Bishop Joseph Walker III of Mount Zion Baptist Church said, adding that he and the community aren't focusing on McNair's relationship with 20-year-old Sahel Kazemi.
McNair, 36, was a married man shot four times in his sleep on the Fourth of July by a girlfriend 16 years his junior, who then killed herself. Kazemi was distraught about mounting financial problems and her belief that he was seeing someone else, police said Wednesday.
McNair's wife, Mechelle, has not spoken publicly since the shooting. No record of divorce proceedings have surfaced, and Mike Mu, who is handling media for the memorial service, said Mechelle McNair didn't know who Kazemi was.
That's not how McNair will be remembered Thursday during viewings at a funeral home and the stadium where he once played. His friends, ex-teammates, former coaches and wife will celebrate him at a memorial service.
This post reeks with spiritual pride. Have any of you actually ever walked through the effects of adultery with church members? Have you ever sat down with a wife and kids after the shock of finding out something like this? And you are making a lot of assumptions based on a couple of sentences in an interview. I wonder if it would be more productive to pray for this man and this church as they walk through the difficult process of restoring their marriage.
>>> Have any of you actually ever
>>> walked through the effects of
>>> adultery with church members?
Of course not. No one at Tim's church ever commits adultery, and no one ever sins. By the way, please contact me if you're interested in a prime real estate deal. I've got some ocean front property in Arizona. From my front porch you can see the sea.
I thought the elders at Ted Haggard's former church handled his case of infidelity about as well as can be expected.
I try not to wrestle with the pigs by commenting on blogs like this, but I cannot believe that the words "how encouraging" were just used in response to finding out that a church excommunicates someone. Sounds like we are cheering that the 1 left and high-fiving the 99? I am sad by the post. As someone who would consider himself reformed, I am embarrassed by how absolutely prideful most who wear that name.
And just as a side not - do we actually judge a church by how much Spurgeon is in the Bulletin? I though we reformers were for the Bible?
I would pray that if a national magazine calls you moments after a member has publicly confessed sin you would do your best to protect the wife and children and keep an open door with the sinner. But maybe for that wish I should be excommunicated...
Josh,
I think the point of the post is lack of exercising oversight and submitting to it. I Peter 5 tells shepherds to shepherd, not offer help if someone kinda wants it. It also tells us to be subject to elders with no caveat for whether we want help. Hebrews 13 tells us that those who have rule over us watch over our souls. This simply cannot be squared with an elder saying, "if they desire his help."
And Shawn, where did Tim call for the Pastor to give up the protection of the wife and kids? He is calling for just the opposite, the biblical protection of wife, kids, and husband. Scott Tibbs dealt in his post.
Scott Tibbs dealt with this in his post
>>As someone who would consider himself reformed, I am embarrassed by how absolutely prideful most who wear that name.
Shawn, you are a rose surrounded by thorns. You are the quintessential humble-man...I meet lots of men like you each week.
I'm certain Shawn would take on the difficult task of embracing this man rather than chase him out. I'm also certain Shawn would do the difficult task of embracing this man if he were to come back to the fold...let some other proud fellow chase him back, Shawn is all about the love and humility. Humble shepherd don't need rods and staffs.
For the Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost. (Jesus; Luke 19:10)
The issue is simple. Shepherds are gifted, called, and ordained to shepherd a particular flock of particular souls. This means going after the one lost sheep. Jesus our Good Shepherd came after us when we were His enemies and didn't welcome His interest and pastoral care. Remember, He died?
And if you've worked with sheep (or goats or cattle), you know that one lost sheep often is perfectly opposed to being brought back to the sheepfold. Sometimes he must be manhandled to get him to safety. This is the reason David, in Psalm 23, says...
"Thy rod and thy staff, they comfort me." Discipline is a great comfort to redeemed souls because, according to Hebrews 12, it is proof of the Father's love. So, also, it's proof of the love of His undershepherds.
As the Holy Spirit says in Hebrews 12, sons who aren't disciplined are illegitimate sons (12:8). This is why I rejoiced to hear of a church excommunicating one of its members. Such kindness and love for the sinner is so rare, today. Pastors and elders are too busy scratching itching ears, pandering to their sheep, to seek out the lost one and bring him home.
And that is one of the purposes of discipline--to return the lost sheep to God's flock. Even the most severe form of discipline--excommunication--often produces the fruit of repentance and the sinner's return to Christ's flock.
But all the above is largely disconnected with the point of the post directing attention to the pastor's comment. My concern is that any man in the pastorate would think, let alone say in public, that his shepherding of one of his sheep at a time of glaring and very public scandal ought only to be given if requested.
Lost sheep are lost, after all. And a good shepherd, like our Good Shepherd, seeks them out knowing very well he might have his hands full when he finds them. We don't sleep in the sheepfold at night with our ears half-cocked for a bleat at the bottom of a ravine two miles off, on the other side of the mountain as the wind howls.
One last thing: If a man or woman commits adultery and is unrepentant, the shepherd goes after the adulterer precisely because he cares for the innocent spouse and children--not just the adulterer.
What is obscene is the frequent practice of pastors and elders washing their hands of the situation, allowing the adulterer to adulterate both his family bed and the Church, Herself.
Too many times, I've heard of a man committing adultery, casting off the wife of his youth and their children, then being allowed to show up in church with young flesh as everyone watches, including his children. Not a word of rebuke, let alone an act of discipline, from the pastor or elders. With impunity he sits there with his trophy wife, across the sanctuary from his abandoned first wife and precious children.
But he has nothing to fear. The pastor and elders are waiting for him, his first wife, his children, or his second wife to indicate they want help.
One final matter: like Scripture, adultery is a constant in every church. The only distinction between churches is those that, from love, see it and act pastorally; and those who, out of lovelessness, cultivate blindness and are passive when that blindness is insufficient to hide the sad truth.
Any reader who is in the second kind of church should leave, immediately, and find a church where there are shepherds after God's Own heart.
It's a simple truth that a shepherd who refuses to go out seeking the lost sheep is leading a church where church discipline is absent; but also, a church where the preaching of the Word of God and the administration of the Sacraments are not done rightly--Biblically.
In other words, the marks of the church are absent and it's no true church.
Love in Christ, our Shepherd and Lamb,
PS: I've posted this comment on the main page and ask that future discussions of these issues occur there. Thanks.