Not your mother's DTS...
"The fact that the women were there during the most significant events in the life of Jesus meant that the apostles, the male apostles could not write the Gospels without collaborating with the women." -Ms. Carolyn Custis James in Dallas Theological Seminary chapel on March 28, 2008
(Tim, w/thanks to John) During a CBMW council meeting about ten years ago, I listened to one of the high priests of evangelical exegetical scholarship rebuke the council for our work opposing gender-neutered Bible translations. Wayne Grudem had been excited at the possibility that an invitation to sit in on the council meeting might be enough of an enticement to get this scholar to allow CBMW to use his name on the council or as a member of the Board of Reference, but instead of being awed by the company he'd been given entree to, he took the opportunity to poke us in the nose...
Yes, he was a Dallas Theological Seminary professor, but really he was just one more politically correct academic zealous for the sexual revolution, and he resented those opposing it.
Sitting in that meeting, I realized DTS was gone. It was living on the spiritual capital of godly men of the past, but that capital was greatly depleted and wouldn't outlast the destroyers who now held the key academic appointments on the seminary campus.
Then, earlier today, a PCA pastor E-mailed me a link to this video of Carolyn Custis James' sermon, "The Role of Women in Both Ministry and Life," preached in the DTS chapel a couple weeks ago, on March 25, 2008. The scuttlebutt is that all the prophecy charts sold in the seminary bookstore are now under revision in order to incorporate a new dispensation titled "Womynchurch Age," and that Ms. Carolyn Custis James is assisting the project as editorial consultant.
But back to the video: It's hard to imagine how people sat through this I/ME/MINE spiel of self-promotion. Did anyone watch her hands? Reminded me of a prestidigitator.




Comments
does it matter that her husband is the president of rts orlando?
My brother tried to call him out on his wife's schismatic actions but Mr. James never responded and largely remains her silent partner.
http://www.baylyblog.com/2006/02/come_out_from_b.html
Mrs. James said, "The fact that the women were there during the most significant events in the life of Jesus meant that the apostles, the male apostles could not write the Gospels without collaborating with the women."
As my annoying cousin (she was one year old than I so she was required to be, at least occasionally, annoying) used to say:
"So?"
Yes, yes, we all know women where there, yadda yadda yadda. But which of the Gospels was written by a woman? Which of the twelve was female? Sorry, but I simply can't pull either name from my, admittedly feeble, memory.
Wait, Wait! I know - It was Ezerette!
Kamilla
should that bother me as a reformed Christian, or as (Lord-willing) future seminary student?
Nice rumor. It's awesome that we don't need to worry about gossip as long as it's about someone who is obviously guilty.
The rumor is a joke. Dallas ditched their dispensation charts a few decades ago.
>"The fact that the women were there during the most significant events in the life of Jesus meant that.....<
"The fact that the Pharisees were there during the most significant events in the life of Jesus meant that....."
"The fact that the Roman Soldiers were there during the most significant events in the life of Jesus meant that....."
"The fact that the Zealots were there during the most significant events in the life of Jesus meant that....."
The above demonstration of the non sequitur fallacy is brought to you courtesy of Carolyn James.
One also wonders where Mrs Custis-James would place the Transfiguration, Gethsemane and the Last Passover on her list of "most significant events"? What about Mr. Custis-James? ::grin::
Look, I like a good "serrated edge" as much as anyone, but satire needs to be over-the-top enough to obviously be satire. I suppose it's a sign of the times that a Womynchurch Age is no longer over-the-top, but nonetheless.
As a Dallas alum, all I can say is I'm thankful I got my education there when I did...30 years ago. I remember chapel services very well, and we did not have such messages delivered by such individuals. You are very right, DTS is not the school it once was.
I understood your comments very well, Tim, and you are spot on.
Add new comment