But of course...

(Tim, w/thanks to Hendo) Der Spiegel has an article on Europe's population decline and the impact it's having on the hiring of women for management positions. From the article:

Companies with a blend of male and female senior executives are more successful, both economically and in terms of their corporate culture. According to the studies, the companies with the most women in senior management achieved a return on equity that was up to 53 percent higher than those without women in top-ranking positions. Earnings were shown to be significantly higher in companies with at least three women on their management boards. Three appears to the magic number, because it enables women to influence the dominant culture in a group.

Is this really news?

The argument hasn't been that women executives make corporations less profitable. My wife and daughters could run any business fine, thank you. Trust me.

But while they're off earning serious money as captains of industry and masters of the universe, who exactly is carrying the unborn nestled in the womb? Who is giving birth? Who is nursing the young?

Reading this article about Germany could lead one to conclude that the entire nation has gone stark raving mad. No one's willing to be a mother and have babies, so they're taking the mothers who have had babies and shooting them into the boardroom. And they think they've discovered something when these mothers prove to be resilient, disciplined, selfless, wise, hardworking, and responsible?

Nations show their priorities by where you find their women...

Germany puts them in the corporate boardroom, the United States puts them in a Humvee in Iraq, and London puts them in Number 10 Downing Street. But the Church of Jesus Christ puts them nowhere.

Rather, Christian women in the Church have enough freedom to chose to be feminine and to devote themselves to their home, husbands, and children. And anyone who says these women are forced by their husbands to stay home needs to go find a homeschooling mother and ask her what she'd really like to be doing if she had a choice?

Then duck.

Tags: 

Comments

A couple weeks ago I picked up a used copy of Gunter Grass's 1980 novel "Headbirths, or The Germans are Dying Out," the back cover summary of which reads: "Summer 1980. Harm and Dorte Peters, the quintessential German couple, are on vacation in Asia. But wherever they are--Bangkok, or Bali, or in Bombay--they can't get away from the election-year political upheaval back home. Nor can the Peterss get away from themselves. What will it be: Yes-to-baby or No-to-baby? "Grass has wicked fun tracing the couple's route. With irony, wit and brilliant inventiveness, he takes aim at capitalism, communism, religion, reproduction--nothing escapes unscathed. Writing shortly after his return from a trip to China, Grass contrasts Asia's teeming multitudes with Germany's shrinking population and envisions a wave of immigrants engulfing what was once the Fuhrer's living space--a multicolored racial mixture inheriting the German earth. He treats such apocalyptic themes as the survival of nations and the atomic threat with outrageous creativity. This is quintessential Gunter Grass." I haven't read the novel yet, but it looks like people have been noticing the downward population trends for decades now. I wonder when those in power are going to start noticing.

Why would you have to duck? Would she really rather be in the military and shooting people? ;-) Alas, only married Christian women have this freedom. Single Christian women can be stuck in cubicles 40 hours a week quite against their wishes!

You'd have to duck because asking "what she'd really like to be doing" implies it would be something other than what she's already doing. >>Alas, only married Christian women have this freedom. Sadly true, although single Christian women can do children, if they wish. Some of my childhood teachers were quite influential in my life, and loved.

Yeah, yeah, I knew that about the ducking. Was just making a lame duck joke! Alas, I don't think I'm not cut out to be a classroom teacher. But I do appreciate being able to help my friends nurture their covenant children. It still amazes me every time I'm able to love a kid effectively, and every time they love me back!

Nations show their priorities by where you find their women ... London puts them in Number 10 Downing Street Yes, and Margaret Thatcher did the UK a power of good in her eleven years in power, getting the country out of the miasma that had dominated it in the post-war period. Notably, by breaking down the out-of-control English union culture. She was also a strong support of your President Reagan as well.

Ross, Tim's not denying that many women do a great job in certain positions. He's pointing out that there is an even more important position for women, and the shame of men who do not step up to the plate to confront obvious injustices--like Britian's postwar socialistic disaster.

Add new comment