Congressman Siljander's new way past Islamaphobia: Follow the money...

(Tim) This indictment is interesting news. Congressman Siljander is at the forefront of the movement to meld Islam and Christianity into one faith while claiming believers from both sides are being perfectly faithful to their own tradition if they affirm this syncretistic mutation.

In the old days, Congressman Siljander was known to be an evangelical Christian. But now he's living off the fat of Islamic land taking money from Islamic groups in Pakistan and Sudan to help him write a book purporting to show us the way to rapprochement between followers of Jesus and Muhammad. Says Cong. Siljander: "I could not find one verse in the entire New Testament that ever suggested we should convert anyone to any religion."

It all reminds me of the letter my Dad wrote to Rabbi Yechiel Exkstein declining Yechiel's request that he sit on the board of Eckstein's newly chartered Holyland Fellowship of Christians and Jews (since renamed the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews) back some twenty-five years ago. Despite their close personal friendship, Dad explained to Yechiel that it would be impossible for him to serve on Yechiel's board without feeling pressure to compromise his faith by no longer calling Yechiel to faith in the Jewish Messiah, Jesus Christ. And yes, those are the very words Dad used...

Of the letters Dad showed me through the years, this was one of the most loving and tender. It was for similar reasons that Dad also publicly opposed Christian leaders accepting free junkets to Israel that were paid for by Zionist Jews.

Who knows what kind of compromise the Apostle Paul could have come up with in his letter to the Galatians if the Judaizers had been smart enough to throw a few greenbacks his way?

Tags: 

Comments

Tim, Reflecting on some other dust-ups in the recent past, I'm curious if it would be Biblical justice for the publisher to see the indictment as an indication of sufficient guilt that the book shouldn't go to press. A guilty verdict, sure. A guilty-plea, sure. But an indictment? Would a widely publicized (non-anonymous) charge by several competent witnesses have been sufficient to put the kibosh on the book? Or is it a pragmatic rather than moral issue; i.e. why bother publishing it after such a publicity fiasco, regardless of the facts of the case? Thanks, Keith

Either my memory is quite fickle, or this post has mutated since I made my comment. No problem with that, but now my comment looks kind of misplaced ;) Just noting so that I don't appear more insane than I actually am.

Your dad was a great Christian example to us all, Tim. Thank you for posting this. It drives me crazy to see Hagee, Hinn et. al--and even some more "reasonable" Christians like Kay Arthur--blurring the Gospel in their support for the state of Israel. Would that they had the Gospel integrity of your dad.

Dear Keith, After a man in my church took me to task for what I wrote here, I added a lot to this post. And it was in the direction of clarifying my objection so it would be clear that it has little to do with the indictment, but much to do who's filling Cong. Siljander's wallet. But beyond that, the news piece from Tulsa shows that his book should not be published for any number of reasons having nothing to do with money. It's somewhat of a comfort to see that the publisher is Harperone rather than Zondervan or Nelson. * * * Thank you, Richard, for your kind words about Dad.

I'd be interested to know what the rabbi's response to your dad's letter was. Did he take it in the gentle spirit it was meant?

>>Did he take it in the gentle spirit it was meant? Oh yes. Absolutely. They were quite close.

Add new comment